afpj
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2009
- Posts
- 804
- Reaction score
- 359
Team TYF, a buddy has a 2003 Tahoe 4x4 LT WITH 190k-ish miles. He asked me for an opinion since I had the same issue a few months ago.
He has high LTFT’s about (+) 15-16 banks one and 2 At idle. STFT are WNL around + 3 % or less. At 2000 rpm, LFTF drop to about 5-7 % both banks. Sure looks like a vac leak but it cannot be found. Water, flammable spray, butane (yeah we had a fire extinguisher handy), smoke , cannot find it. MAF is less than 3 months old OE Delphi ( replaced as part of this troubleshooting). He noticed that if he idles with the no Engine air filter, the LTFT are worse at +22% . He didn’t say what it dropped to at higher rpm. My question is, if a vac leak, why would higher air flow (no filter) make the fuel trims go higher? Is this an indication it’s not a vac leak? Pre cat O2 sensors are maybe 1 year old, and look to be switching regularly. I’m trying to understand the physics of how less restricted air flow pre MAF would affect fuel trims.
Thank you all for any wisdom to impart to us.
He has high LTFT’s about (+) 15-16 banks one and 2 At idle. STFT are WNL around + 3 % or less. At 2000 rpm, LFTF drop to about 5-7 % both banks. Sure looks like a vac leak but it cannot be found. Water, flammable spray, butane (yeah we had a fire extinguisher handy), smoke , cannot find it. MAF is less than 3 months old OE Delphi ( replaced as part of this troubleshooting). He noticed that if he idles with the no Engine air filter, the LTFT are worse at +22% . He didn’t say what it dropped to at higher rpm. My question is, if a vac leak, why would higher air flow (no filter) make the fuel trims go higher? Is this an indication it’s not a vac leak? Pre cat O2 sensors are maybe 1 year old, and look to be switching regularly. I’m trying to understand the physics of how less restricted air flow pre MAF would affect fuel trims.
Thank you all for any wisdom to impart to us.
Last edited: