Marky Dissod
Full Access Member
Your doubts are neither entirely right, nor entirely wrong.... More frequent oil and filter changes slow down that process tremendously.
I understand the GM oil life monitor is actually highly rated, and was done with several years of study with oil analysis.
I'm just not sure, and I have my doubts, if their studies were actual real world conditions. I feel the safe bet is to change it every 3,500 to 5,000 miles.
(The oil life monitor can vary all the way up to and beyond 8,000 miles.)
In principle, GM's Oil Life Monitor tracks and accounts for lots of things that odo mileage just can't:
*How often the engine is shut down and restarted, engine temp at restart
(likely ignored by vehicles with 'snooze feature', quite possibly to that engine's detriment)
*How much more time the engine spends at operating temp vs 'warming up'
*How conservatively or aggressively it's driven, vs how much time it spends with the TCC locked
(obviously worst to drive aggressively while warming up only to shut down before fully warmed up)
*How much time the engine spends idling (odometer alone cannot account for this at all)
The Oil Life Monitor is basically a 'bank' of engine RpMs.
The more slowly RpMs are accrued, the better, obviously.
The above list and several other factors 'penalize' those 'RpMs' more quickly than one might expect.
If the engine suffers an overheat, even briefly, the OLM drops to 0.
However, GM defines an overheat as 257F (if not hotter), whereas I define it as 239F.
(By the way, EVERY UNDERHOOD FLUID should be changed ASAP after an overheat, including brake fluid, is how paranoid I am.)
If it spends most of its service life getting 20MpG (or better), it needs oil changes
less often than an otherwise identical vehicle that gets 10MpG.
The OLM tries to account for whatever nuances are left after MpGs.
However, it is entirely possible to account for every mechanical factor,
and STILL be influenced by the environmental lobby.
More to come ...