DuraYuk
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2022
- Posts
- 836
- Reaction score
- 601
Dude you won't win against the advocates of the old stuff. The old stuff is junk compared to new and that holds true with any brand. I the old gm stuff was terrible.From an advancement perspective, I disagree
Considering Performance:
1998 chevy 1500 4x4 towing 5k - 6k
1998 chevy 1500 4x4 with the 5.7, 255hp, 12/17 mileage
2023 chevy 1500 4x4 towing 8800 - 9500
2023 chevy 1500 4x4 with the 5.3, 355hp, 16/20 mileage
2023 chevy 1500 4x4 with the 6.2, 420hp, 16/20 mileage
2023 chevy 1500 4x4 with the 3.0, 305hp, 24/29 mileage
The 2023's are significantly more drivable, auto 4x4 wasn't in the 1998 version. The brakes, traction control, stability systems are night and day different. When you drive them they aren't the same, the 1998 is loud, handles worse, brakes worse, hvac is worse, performs worse, less comfortable, it isn't on the same level as a 2023 flavor.
Durability / longevity; its a crap shoot. Lots of high mileage vehicles across all the years.
Getting high mileage out of a 255hp power train is a lot easier then out of a 420hp power train.
My ecoDiesel has had a significantly lower total cost of ownership then the gaser gmc it replaced. My wife's denali duramax is also cheaper to run then the 6.2 it replaced (double the empty mileage, triple the towing mileage), maintenance has been a wash.
Another thing. I hate anything that isn't obd2. I want data. I don't like guessing. Obd1 and older sucks. Carbs suck.