Thanks Charlie, so the BTR stage 2's specs are: 212/218, .553/.553, 111+0 and the Truck Norris's specs are: Specs: 212/22X, .552/.552, 107.
To these, I'll add the specs for the Cam Motion Stage 2 Truck Cam: 206/210, .553/.553, 115+5 "High-Lift" version, for comparison.
What I was interested in was the lobe separation angle (LSA). All of three of these cams will perform better than stock - especially above 4500 RPM. But, with LSA's of 107 for the Truck Norris cam you can expect it to be significantly choppier at idle than the BTR stage 2 cam, which is already pretty choppy. For me, that was an unpleasant experience in a daily driver.
All three have similar valve lift for airflow, and the Truck Norris cam predictably performs best on the high end (as you would expect given the durations) but in my opinion, that's more than offset with worse drivability and minimal, if any, gains from idle through 4500, which is where most of us spend our time driving around.
The Cam Motion cam offers a smooth idle and good power gains that you'll feel on the butt dyno throughout the rev range so in my opinion the drivability and enjoyability for 99% of the driving I do, is much better. And having had both the BTR stage 2 and now the Cam Motion Stage 2, there is no comparison for me. I much prefer the driving experience of the latter. And for me, the Truck Norris was never even a contender given the higher power band and Harley-Davidson-esq idle.
And to further make myself sound like a shill for Cam Motion, they also have grinds for this cam that are specific to the 4.8, 5.3, 6.0 and 6.2, so they optimize it for the flow characteristics of each engine. The BTR cams are one grind fits all.