cardude2000
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Posts
- 2,931
- Reaction score
- 1,037
Nope.Actually, you missed the point...again. Lets review...
We are truck enthusiasts on a GM SUV forum, and you are the petulant ford fanboy troll we all must endure. We are discussing the newest model SUV, and you claim blind loyalty is its reason for success vs. the superior ford. This was your point, not the subsequent one about your favorite band (cher or celine dion or whoever)...
I showed that whether GM sells more OR less of their product initially, it is alway MORE valuable to a used buyer vs. a ford. This is what makes it better, no matter what other bs you use to quantify a quality. This is the one. Your welcome for winning...
First, the new model hasn’t been released so it has no success yet. I said that if it can’t tow and looks terrible then it will need brand/blind loyalty to succeed.
You said GM had “decades of dominance”. I noted that dominating in sales doesn’t mean you are “the best”.
Then you breathlessly backpeddled with “but but but used sales are what matter!!!”
Oh and I’ve spent over $125k on GM products over the last 6 years. That’s a lot for a Ford fanboy.
How much have you spent?
Honestly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk