pwtr02ss
Full Access Member
Well, brother. I know it's not coming from a she, but it's perfect :hug:I wish that was what she said.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Well, brother. I know it's not coming from a she, but it's perfect :hug:I wish that was what she said.
Don’t you have the actual sensor in your rig..? Rather than the “calculator” typical with the GMT900? That’s annoying af that it’s not getting the correct percentage.Latest sample. I'm calling it 69%
View attachment 396320
But it's calculating it as 56%
View attachment 396321
I got nine gallons of E85 and saw that Fuel Composition Learn went to "Active" right after leaving the gas station. Maybe 2-3 miles later, it was back to 56% and "Inactive"
I'll see what this current tank percentage is then probably switch back to E10 93.
Don’t you have the actual sensor in your rig..? Rather than the “calculator” typical with the GMT900? That’s annoying af that it’s not getting the correct percentage.
should be able to adjust learning cycle in the tune...I don't because I haven't retrofitted (yet?). I was gonna do it then found that the "virtual sensor" was reporting MUCH more accurately, within 2% of actual, since replacing the O2 sensors. Now it's back to being way off. Not as bad as before when it was stuck around 22%. But still far enough off to be disadvantageous. Also, the really short learning cycle is an annoying mystery.