2011SSVHOE
I'm an egual oportunity offender
Force/leverage is pretty much along the same lines. You're pushing the pads against the rotors harder. The problem is, they're the same surface area. Heat can only get disdipated so fast. But drive one of our trucks down a one-lane road about 4-5,000 feet elevation drop in a few miles and you'd be scared with our stock size rotors, I guarantee you. I had literally zero brakes about three quarters of the way down, and if I'd come upon an uphill vehicle as I came around a corner I'd have been screwed. I wasn't driving that fast but as soon as I would let off the brakes I would be doing 30-40 again. So like I said, it depends on what you need from your brakes. In no way would hydroboost have done much but in normal city driving it does help.
The only difference between the Hydro-boost vs Vacuum is how the energy is applied. I had a Chevy Caprice classic diesel wagon It had the hydro-boost because diesel engines don't produce vacuum .
When I go down the mountain with about a 12 to 15 hundred elevation drop, I always drop the trans into 2 after leaving the top, I can toggle back and forth between 2 and 3. I keep my feet off the brakes as much as possible. But in the back of my head am I taxing my transmission to save the brakes?