Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
That seems a strange sort of logic to me. Haven't compared the ground clearance between the live axle and IRS versions, but I'm pretty sure your clearance in back either way won't be worse than the front, so what difference would it make?was told to stay away from the new Yukons due to the rear suspension hanging low because its not good off road. would be using it on the beach. has this been a problem for anyone ?
Note that Land Rover has a very similar independent rear suspension design on their rigs. I owned a 2007 LR3 with this setup after having owned a 2004 Discovery 2 with the solid rear axle setup. The rear suspension arms hung low like those on the new Yukons, and everyone in the Land Rover world was worried about them, but their fears were proven to be for naught. The LR3 was a far superior off-road truck to the Discovery 2 in every way. Mine was bone stock and it made it through the infamous "Metal Masher" in Moab with no issues. I don't think the IRS in these new trucks will cause any trouble at all off-road.was told to stay away from the new Yukons due to the rear suspension hanging low because its not good off road. would be using it on the beach. has this been a problem for anyone ?
LOL, who wants to take a $75k jeep off road? no space of any kind in it or on it, you have to tow a trailer to carry anything lolWho wants to take a pretty $75k suv off road? Go buy a jeep, I try to keep any bit of dirt off mine. But I guess to each their own....