New 2023 Yukon At4 Order - 6.2L unavailable

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Vladimir2306

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2023
Posts
469
Reaction score
469
The previous generation to the 5.3L was the Vortec 5.7L, which I'm very familiar with. 255hp. Never saw it as a sluggish engine until...my son brought home his 2016 Silverado a couple years ago. That 5.3L in comparison makes my 5.7L feel like Fred Flintstone's feet are pushing it lol. 355hp in that 5.3L of his I'm told. The 5.3L is a great little eight.

1hp per cubic inch has always been considered a very desirable benchmark for horsepower in an engine. That 5.3L exceeds that benchmark definitively.
As I understand it, this is a very previous generation))) Because the Tahoe 900, which since 2007 or 2008, has already come with a 5.3 325 horsepower engine. and accelerated in the same way as the current 5.3 355 horsepower, and, well, like a diesel engine with 280 forces.
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,251
Reaction score
1,828
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
The 5.3 isn't bad, and you probably won't know what you are missing...but the 6.2 definitely changes the driving experience...for the better. I have a friend that has a Sierra pickup w/ the 5.3 and the 10 speed. It's not bad...and is also about 800 lbs lighter that the Yukon XL I drive. But, I'd take my 6.2 for smiles per mile over it...If your order hasn't been accepted yet, you could go back to your dealer and have it changed...it is likely that eventually he will get an allocation for a 6.2. Meantime, if you want to drive both engine choices, or even all 3, including the diesel, the Pickups are pretty plentiful right now, go drive them all...then make your call. Performance will be very similar between them.
 

BDM3

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2023
Posts
37
Reaction score
48
My wife has a 5.3 2023 Tahoe. I daily drive a GLC63 right now which is pretty quick. But when I drive the Tahoe, it still has plenty of what I’m looking for to navigate through this south Florida traffic. I haven’t had any power complaints yet. With that said, my Yukon will be coming with the 6.2, if I was unable to get it, I would go for the diesel over the 5.3. Although I really don’t think I’ll notice much of a difference from her Tahoe to my Yukon.
 

Hoesgottaeat2

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2022
Posts
727
Reaction score
2,280
Location
Western NY
As I understand it, this is a very previous generation))) Because the Tahoe 900, which since 2007 or 2008, has already come with a 5.3 325 horsepower engine. and accelerated in the same way as the current 5.3 355 horsepower, and, well, like a diesel engine with 280 forces.
Sounds like you understand it pretty accurately. I was merely trying to offer some encouragement to a fella is all. That 5.3L is a great motor. I'm a bit old school and outdated. In fact, I have (4) other rigs that are still carbureted. (2) of which make that 5.3L look like a chump lol.
 

Vladimir2306

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2023
Posts
469
Reaction score
469
Sounds like you understand it pretty accurately. I was merely trying to offer some encouragement to a fella is all. That 5.3L is a great motor. I'm a bit old school and outdated. In fact, I have (4) other rigs that are still carbureted. (2) of which make that 5.3L look like a chump lol.
I agree, the 5.3 engine is excellent)))) but not when it is compared with 6.2))) but here is a completely different story. By the way, in terms of fuel consumption, 6.2 is about the same as 5.3))) but 6 seconds to a hundred ... this is WOW))))
 

tjs3922

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Posts
190
Reaction score
163
I have had both. I do not really notice the difference. I have two 6.2 right now, had a 2020 Suburban with the 5.3 and it was great. Dont let this hold you back.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,091
Posts
1,862,274
Members
96,559
Latest member
McRib
Top