NHTSA opens preliminary probe into more than 870,000 GM vehicles

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,331
Reaction score
1,929
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
Case in point with a gen 5 6.2


In general bore size , combustion chamber design, ignition timing , and afr are foundational drivers of pre-ignition because they determine the pace of the flame front.

Low engine speeds and low throttle positions are low VE which require higher ignition timing. The pace of the flame front is relatively slow.

A large and fast change in throttle position can trigger a pre ignition event… even with low dynamic compression. This is a rapid change from low ve to moderate or high ve with ignition timing still at a fairly advanced stage. The flame front is a bit too slow and ignition occurs in advance of it leading to pre ignition.

Modern engine controls have done a good job of managing these lspi events…. But it is always an issue that requires consideration for obvious reasons.

Throw in fuel dilution of the oil and you can get a situation like in the case above, where the system detects the lspi event but can’t do anything about it.
That article is some fascinating stuff; and is dated in 2017. I would expect the conclusions have been reached by now. And I would expect the Big 3 (and others) were and are aware of it. So...did they react? Would be interesting to see the actual conclusions of that research...I will search for a follow up article when I get time. Thanks for sharing.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
235
Reaction score
147
I think like anything there was a funding issue that impacted carry on testing.

Not condemning any of these guys for their knowlege and/or testing, BUT they really did not perform "Real World" testing and "Real World" data gathering.

These motors in daily use rarely ever see anything above 2500 RPM, there testing did not even start until above this RPM. They need to test, dyno and load the engines how the vehicles are driven on a daily basis to really get the real world info.

Driving my truck, the engine never gets over 1800 RPM on the highway unless I really need to pass and get around traffic. The engine typically runs around 1600 RPM for the majority of my highway drives and I have started to monitor the Calculated Engine Load % and I was SHOCKED at least with the 6.2l the engine tends to operate often between 50% and 90% calculated load without ever downshifting under most conditions. This in terms is literally "Low Speed" and High Loading conditions that need to be tested and replicated in the lab enviroment.

The other thing that needs to happen during this style of testing is to pre-contaminated the engine oil with fuel to simulate what happens in the real world. Baseline the engine with clean/fresh oil, then start to contaminate the engine oil with fuel and possibly water and then see what happens. There is enough data from oil sampling (Speed Diagnostics is Lake Speeds Oil Analysis Company) they know what the typical and higher range of fuel contamination actually is based on sampling. Then they probably need to push even further with fuel contamination because there are times where the fuel levels are probably higher before some of the fuel is actually "cooked" off.
 

blanchard7684

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2024
Posts
121
Reaction score
29
Driving my truck, the engine never gets over 1800 RPM on the highway unless I really need to pass and get around traffic. The engine typically runs around 1600 RPM for the majority of my highway drives and I have started to monitor the Calculated Engine Load % and I was SHOCKED at least with the 6.2l the engine tends to operate often between 50% and 90% calculated load without ever downshifting under most conditions. This in terms is literally "Low Speed" and High Loading conditions that need to be tested and replicated in the lab enviroment.
Damn. The 5.3 in my suburban can’t sniff that. 1600 rpm and up to 90% load is nuts.
 

KMeloney

Full Access Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Posts
3,008
Reaction score
376
Anyone have any sense for whether the 6.2 failures occur only at highway speeds? Most (if not all) of the stories I've read about have occurred on the highway, presumably at or over 65 mph. I haven't read about a failure occurring in town/in stop-and-go traffic.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
235
Reaction score
147
Anyone have any sense for whether the 6.2 failures occur only at highway speeds? Most (if not all) of the stories I've read about have occurred on the highway, presumably at or over 65 mph. I haven't read about a failure occurring in town/in stop-and-go traffic.
Seems to be a number of failure modes.

I posted a YouTube link earlier in the thread of a Cadillac Escalade that failed at the dealer with 4 miles on the engine. Broken connecting rod. This was clearly a wrist pin that walked sideways and jammed the piston in the cylinder. The rod bearing was fine. So this was clearly not an oiling problem.

Most of the highway failures IMHO and based my research have been bearing failures of some sort. Maybe we are only hearing about engines failing on the highway because is can be rather dangerous depending on the situation. Maybe any pre-failures where the engine is noisy are taken to shops before the engine siezes. Maybe there are engines siezing when in town or while idling that nobody is really speaking out about? But given the loading the 6.2l can put on rod bearings due to the high torque at lower RPM's I can see a lot of failures on the highway.

I think most of the bearing failures are oil related:

1. Lack of oil, oil consumption causing the oil level to drop and the low oil light does not come on until the oil is 2+ quarts low. If you own a 6.2l you NEED to check the oil at every other fill up. The stupid dipstick also will not have oil showing if the engine is 1 quart low. You should fill the crankcase up to the dipstick shows oil to the TOP of the hash marks, even slightly above is fine. I run 9 qts in my engine at oil change with filter, the engine really needs somewhere between 8.5-8.75 qts at oil change even though documents indicate 8.0 qts with filter.

2. 6.2 has a 2 stage oil pump, I question the pressure/volume available during high loads at highway speeds with 0W20 engine oil. The 5.3l has the same basic oil pump, but not the ECM 2 stage presure control. I have it from a few sources that the 5.3l runs close to 60 PSI at highway cruise, my 6.2l runs at 45-46 PSI at about 75 MPH/1600 RPM as measured with an advanced scan tool that interogates the oil pressure transducer. This pretty much matched the area the oil pressure gauge as shown on the dash, but with no numbers other than 0 and 120 it is hard to tell based on how far to the left of the center mark!

3. Fuel contamination in the oil either by itself and or oil that is contamined with fuel but it 1-2 quarts low on a regular basis.

4. Higher mileage failures are more likely due to long term exposure to fuel contaminated oil, low oil levels, long OCI's, causing bearing damage due to the 3 above issues and/or LSPI bearing damage.

5. So far I have seen 3 typical failures, but it would nice to have a wider sampling of failures.

A. Front main bearing failure often coupled with #1 and #2 rod bearing failures. These tend to be early failures, often under 10,000 miles, but not always. IMHO clearly oil starvation, oil quality issues. The accessory drive belts may load the crank snout a bit and without enough oil/oil pressure/oil volume, lower viscosity oil due to fuel contamination, this area is the dead last path on the engine oil flow. Maybe the talk about oversize lifter bores factors into this, I could see how it could and would, but we do not have a good idea of how many engines and what timeframe this could have been an issue, sure there was a bulletin or a number of bulletins because they kept extending the window for oversize lifter bores. And are these engine cores being returned and if the lifter bores are oversized, what is being done to address these before the same engine block is rebuilt and sent out? Are they scrapping these engine block or sleveing the lifter bores?

2. Thrust bearing failures. Not sure if this is just the thrust portion of the center bearing or the entire center bearing is failing. Possibly agrevated by towing? But again, oil condition, lack of oil or oil contamination are the first obvious concerns.

3. Other rod bearing failures, most likely oil, lack of oil or oil contamination are the first obvious concerns. Could also be due to piston clearance issues, piston pin walking causing bearing to crank interferance leading to premature bearing failure? LSPI? Could be possible quality issues with bearings, but I would expect to see a much larger amount of failures if this is 100% a bearing quality problems.

4. Not sure I have seen too many main bearing issues other than the #1 and the thrust bearing. Maybe they are out there and I just have not seen them.

5. It almost seems that the DFM lifter issue is scarce now. Maybe with all the premature bearing failures, the lifters have not had a chance to get the hours and miles on them to fail? Maybe they have made improvements with the lifters?

I still think the number of reported cases that have been reported to the NHTSA are low in compared to the number of overall failures. If someone has a failure, even if it is not at highway speeds, please report to the NHTSA so they have a better idea of the number of failures.

Drive defensively and make sure you have a way to the shoulder if you experience a failure. I hate when I get boxed in traffic or have a construction area where there are limited or no shoulders these days! I have actually altered by driving style to expect and deal with a siezed engine while on the highway these days. Not a fun way to drive and to have this nagging in the back of your mind. But as I say, it is what it is. I just do not need the wife and family in the car if there is a catastrohic failure! If that happens a Toyota minivan will be in my future.
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,331
Reaction score
1,929
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
1. Lack of oil, oil consumption causing the oil level to drop and the low oil light does not come on until the oil is 2+ quarts low. If you own a 6.2l you NEED to check the oil at every other fill up. The stupid dipstick also will not have oil showing if the engine is 1 quart low. You should fill the crankcase up to the dipstick shows oil to the TOP of the hash marks, even slightly above is fine. I run 9 qts in my engine at oil change with filter, the engine really needs somewhere between 8.5-8.75 qts at oil change even though documents indicate 8.0 qts with filter.
Had to chuckle at this...my opinion is if you own any internal combustion engine you NEED to check the oil at EVERY fill up...been this way since I started being around engines...

I still think the number of reported cases that have been reported to the NHTSA are low in compared to the number of overall failures. If someone has a failure, even if it is not at highway speeds, please report to the NHTSA so they have a better idea of the number of failures.

I'd expect the NHTSA get that info from GM as part of the investigation; GM said they were cooperating w/ the probe. I would think the first set of data asked for would be the number of 6.2L shipped, and the list of the warranty replacements, the reason for replace, and any data on the failure analysis. Along w/ the serial numbers of the failed engines, date, time, and place of manufacture...
 
Last edited:

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
235
Reaction score
147
Interesting, I already posted about this engine previously, but the comment about the 2025 units are "shipping with a new engine assembly" and should not be susceotable to the same issues.

I would love to know where this info came from for the article and if GM really knows what i going on and has not fessed up. Of is the BS line to get the sales on the 2025 going.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
235
Reaction score
147
Had to chuckle at this...my opinion is if you own any internal combustion engine you NEED to check the oil at EVERY fill up...been this way since I started being around engines...
Agree, but we have become conditioned to less oil leaks and oil consumption up until DI became prevalent. Then with the addition of low oil lights over 25 years ago, many people do not even open the hood of their vehicles.

Top this of with the disappearing dipsticks on many engines!!! The stupid low oil light on engines without dipsticks does not usually come on until the engine is over 1 qt low, sometimes closer to 2 quarts low!

In addtion to verifying the engine oil level, I use the dipstick to monitor the engine oil color and smell if for fuel contaminaiton. So for me the dipstick has 3 purposes, not just to verify the engine oil level.

But I am even guilty of sometimes ignore the wife's car. I try to confiscate it from her at least once a month to drive it, check the tires, fluids, fill up the fuel tank and vacuum and wash it. Many times I find things my wife did not pick up on the way the car was running or a new noise she did not hear.

Unfortunately too many vehicles and engines die a sad death due to neglect.

Dipsticks are for dipsticks, you need to use it if you have one!!!
 
Last edited:

jerry455

Member
Joined
May 19, 2024
Posts
52
Reaction score
28
My Suburban has almost 81,00 miles and has never had any engine work done, it has DFM and Auto Stop. It uses very little oil, maybe half a quart over 5,000-6,000 miles. The oil pressrue at idle is around 30 psi and rises rapidly with RPM. I don't have a scanner, that is on my shopping list. I know the Global B architecture uses the MDI 2 but I want to find an aftermarket scanner because when I retire, I won't have access to that or Service Information.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
235
Reaction score
147
My Suburban has almost 81,00 miles and has never had any engine work done, it has DFM and Auto Stop. It uses very little oil, maybe half a quart over 5,000-6,000 miles. The oil pressrue at idle is around 30 psi and rises rapidly with RPM. I don't have a scanner, that is on my shopping list. I know the Global B architecture uses the MDI 2 but I want to find an aftermarket scanner because when I retire, I won't have access to that or Service Information.
Asssume you have the 6.2l engine?
What year is your Suburban?
What oil do you run in the engine?
Assume you change the oil between 5000-6000 miles or do you follow the OLM to 0%?

I am trying to get context for anyone reporting in.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
133,401
Posts
1,884,869
Members
98,523
Latest member
A_frank_06
Top