Dustin Jackson
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2018
- Posts
- 1,544
- Reaction score
- 1,741
I recently watched a video where a guy was comparing the Tacoma and 4Runner and he said that while he is used to driving the Tacoma that driving the 4Runner was a much better experience because the frame on the 4Runner is a fully boxed frame and the frame of the Tacoma is mostly a C frame only boxed in some areas. Also the Tacoma body and bed are two separate pieces from each other so they do not provide support to each other.
I’m wondering if the Tahoe and Silveradoes are the same way?
With that insight in mind having a fully boxed in frame and a frame length body to provide support to the frame makes it seem like the SUV platform has a huge advantage in those areas that nobody ever talks about when comparing the pros and cons of different off-road rigs.
In my experience I can see that my 2008 Tahoe frame is fully boxed front to rear, a very robust looking frame.
My 94 k1500 doesn’t have a fully boxed frame and when compared to my Tahoe the k1500 frame is not confidence inspiring.
Just something I picked up on, thoughts?
I’m wondering if the Tahoe and Silveradoes are the same way?
With that insight in mind having a fully boxed in frame and a frame length body to provide support to the frame makes it seem like the SUV platform has a huge advantage in those areas that nobody ever talks about when comparing the pros and cons of different off-road rigs.
In my experience I can see that my 2008 Tahoe frame is fully boxed front to rear, a very robust looking frame.
My 94 k1500 doesn’t have a fully boxed frame and when compared to my Tahoe the k1500 frame is not confidence inspiring.
Just something I picked up on, thoughts?