... some changes to vehicle will improve it for the better. will need to spend some tho....
This I'm interested in. I like the truck. I'd like to keep it if it will fit the
NEW mission. I'm looking at: daily driver, 1000 mile trips, towing a 4000 lb (max) toy hauler/RV. So, I need HP for 10k gross and it has to be reliable.
If it will take an engine upgrade, transmission upgrade, or turbo charger - it likely will be tears and "goodbye"
So here is where I'm at:
130K miles
Engine runs smooth, idles smooth. I have not done a compression check.
Oil pressure is 20+ lbs hot idle, 40+ lbs hot cruise, 40+lbs cold idle/cruise
Plugs, wires, rotor, cap changed a couple of months ago. No, they were NAPA's best. Best available in Fairbanks. Existing plugs were tan and even.
Transmission rebuilt 2 years ago. Overhauler is known to do good work. I suspect the Torque converter was replaced. But I'll call and ask. He is a good guy, he will tell me. As for the TC slip (measured with an OBDii scanner, real time), flat to rolling hills, nominal 50% power, 3rd or OD, 50mph to 80mph, TC Slip = 0.
WOT acceleration, WOT downshift, TC slip can get as high as 300rpm. I don't know if this is good or bad. I have not done any reasearch, have not seen any references
Axles are free of noise. I had the lube changed to an arctic grade synthetic 70W
Transfer case is unknown. I had the lube changed when the axles were done. 4WD works great. Mechanic said it had a normal slop for the milage.
If the compression met spec, I'd be reluctant to major the engine. Although, tight rings and grinding the valves could certainly perk up a 130K engine
I'm reluctant to tie into the injection/intake. It starts good, runs smooth. But, if there is something in there that could be limiting the HP? I don't know
Could the exhaust be plugged? Such as a bad CAT or muffler. I don't have an EGT readout - wouldn't know how to check.
I'd be be reluctant to get an ECM tune, unless I understood all the tradeoffs.
I'd really rather not change the gearing. 3.42 to 3.73 front and rear is a lot of money for a 9% increase in torque
A cold air intake sounds interesting. I saw the intake air temp at 100F to 107F (OBDii scanner, real time), with the ambient at 90F (measured by the rear view mirror temp readout (no idea how accurate that is). However, dropping the intake air 17F (doubtful one could even get that), only gets a theoretical 3% increase in the air charge to the cylinders. But, maybe there is inherent restriction in stock intake that the aftermarket stuff does not have. I've heard a lot of claims, but I have never seen a creditable dyno test report.
So where do I go?
This is long and rambling. Anyone that made it this far is gracious. Anyone with ideas is welcome.
the worm