Having been an engineer for one of the major OEMs, I can assure you that the voices of accountants and regulatory compliance officers are heard FAR more than that of engineers.
Its hilarious reading this thread, everyone talking "it was designed and engineered to run X oil", um no, no it wasn't. There hasn't been a totally new design in at least several decades, probably more (because why would you spend all that time on R&D money on something you already have), every new motor design is a copy /paste of a preexisting engine (one that the parent company has licence for) and then its modified to meet whatever new requirements' exist, at the cheapest possible cost, using only parts/ components' / lubricants from preferred suppliers.
I've personally had a situation where the clear, obvious, much better engineering choice was readily available at a very negligible price increase. Guess what, this major OEM used the slightly cheaper option from a preferred supplier because the MBA's make the final calls, not the engineers.
I know this is a diesel engine thread, but just as an example take the gasser 6.2 used in Tahoe/Yukon/Escalade and compare it to the 6.2 gasser found in the Corvette. They are more alike than they are different. The oiled components are identical, but GM say to use 0W40 in the corvette and 0W20 in the Tahoe/Yukon/Escalade. Nothing is different about the reciprocating assemblies between the engines, yet GM recommends two different oils. Why, because of CAFE, no other reason, the thinner oil is not better for anything other than helping GM meet a regulatory requirement.
...