160* Vs 187* Thermostat

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TnTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Posts
788
Reaction score
2
Location
TN
Just curious to why some of you guys/gals are using a 160* thermostat instaed of the stock 187* thermostat? What are they benefits of this?
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Supporting Vendor
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
I wouldn't recommend a lower t-stat, these engines need to run at a higher temp to burn off condensation in the oil.
 

WICKEDOWESIX

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Posts
105
Reaction score
98
Depending on your location and mods depends on the T stat to use. The main purpose of the lower T stat is to have cooler engine coolant temps and increase spark advance (more power) with out KR.

---------- Post added at 05:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM ----------

yep.. the 160's are also awful in the winter

My 160* works fine in ALL seasons. My heater works great in the winter too and my truck still gets to normal operating temps.
 
OP
OP
TnTahoe

TnTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Posts
788
Reaction score
2
Location
TN
im changing my water pump so i figured I'd go ahead and put in a new thermostat as well
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Supporting Vendor
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
My 160* works fine in ALL seasons. My heater works great in the winter too and my truck still gets to normal operating temps.

It isn't the weather that matters, it is the engine temperatures. I wouldn't recommend anything under 180, if you feel the need to change anything,
 

WHITEOUT

Dont Hate-Appreciate
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
934
Reaction score
46
Location
Phoenix
By installing a 160* t-stat, usually, not always, you are going to get overheating. Now, I live in Arizona where it is hella hot in the summer. And by installing a lower degree t-stat, what is going to happen is my engine is going to fight to try to keep the engine cooler. What I mean is, by having the t-stat at 160*, it is constantly going to stay open there for the coolant will never get a chance to cool down inside the radiator with fans, and just keep circulating coolant constantly never getting the chance to cool down. By the t-stat not getting a opportunity to close, the coolant will never get cold enough to close the t-stat, and then overheating will accure.

I've used them on 4-6 cylinder vehicles with no problems, but never on the Tahoe, or V8's. I would like to know if anybody has done this switch, and where they live, how hot it gets in summer, and if it helped.
 

WICKEDOWESIX

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Posts
105
Reaction score
98
By installing a 160* t-stat, usually, not always, you are going to get overheating. Now, I live in Arizona where it is hella hot in the summer. And by installing a lower degree t-stat, what is going to happen is my engine is going to fight to try to keep the engine cooler. What I mean is, by having the t-stat at 160*, it is constantly going to stay open there for the coolant will never get a chance to cool down inside the radiator with fans, and just keep circulating coolant constantly never getting the chance to cool down. By the t-stat not getting a opportunity to close, the coolant will never get cold enough to close the t-stat, and then overheating will accure.

I've used them on 4-6 cylinder vehicles with no problems, but never on the Tahoe, or V8's. I would like to know if anybody has done this switch, and where they live, how hot it gets in summer, and if it helped.


I have never had my truck over heat in the summer. It has gotten to temps up to 115* out here in th esummer and with the AC on it still doesnt over heat. With the proper efan setting you would be ok.
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Supporting Vendor
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
There is a lot of false info out there on the interwebz, we plan on doing a side by side comparison on the dyno with t-stats, much like we did with the CAIs.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,369
Posts
1,866,892
Members
96,996
Latest member
Brynedic
Top