A heads up for y'all.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
20,051
Reaction score
27,252
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Yep, i would pop the mass air flow out once a year and give it a shot of electronic cleaner. Such a random post, but I had two high mileage 6 speeds come in this week with the same issue. Obviously won't fix all of them, but something to keep in mind.

Every January here, which reminds me, one day left to do it! LOL

1738273975641.png
 
OP
OP
H

hagar

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Posts
228
Reaction score
208
when I cleaned my maf, I could see in the logs that I was in a different part of the Dynamic airflow vs rpm map under the same condition. in my case I was logging timing. it moved me higher in the map where it actually ran less timing for the same "load". dynamic airflow bring a blend of maf and map values. they say about 95% of it is map, especially steady state throttle.

I could definitely see the tcm using lower dynamic airflow numbers than it should messing with tranny shift times and pressures.
It's true. If you for example went into your maf transfer function and added 20 percent to the calibration, thus telling the engine it is getting more air flow, your truck would run higher in the load and timing tables. If you pulled fuel out of the maf calibration, the truck would run more ignition timing and show lower in the load based tables such as shift pressures and oncoming clutch volumes and such. It's why so many people used to/still do, wreck the 6/8/10 speeds, they don't calibrate the engine computer to report the correct torque value to the tranny control module. The days of a tranny using rpm and throttle position as it's way to control pressures are gone, it's all about making sure the trans knows what torque the engine is running at. That's why a dirty maf not showing the proper amount of air, makes the computer think it is running at lighter load, then it tells the tranny control module the engine is making less power, so it doesn't need as much line pressure and such.
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
3,376
Reaction score
4,175
I would assume the quality of the air filter makes a time frame difference as well.


when I cleaned mine, it looked more like black oily stuff. like it came firm the pvc system or intake than anything that could come thru the air filter. but yeah, makes sense if you say over oil a k&n style.
 

Marky Dissod

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Posts
2,164
Reaction score
3,007
Location
(718)-
It's true. If you for example went into your maf transfer function and added 20 percent to the calibration, thus telling the engine it is getting more air flow, your truck would run higher in the load and timing tables.
If you pulled fuel out of the maf calibration, the truck would run more ignition timing and show lower in the load based tables such as shift pressures and oncoming clutch volumes and such.
It's why so many people used to/still do, wreck the 6/8/10 speeds, they don't calibrate the engine computer to report the correct torque value to the tranny control module.
The days of a tranny using rpm and throttle position as its way to control pressures are gone, it's all about making sure the trans knows what torque the engine is running at.
That's why a dirty maf not showing the proper amount of air, makes the computer think it is running at lighter load, then it tells the tranny control module the engine is making less power, so it doesn't need as much line pressure and such.
So, is it a good idea to try to 'trick' the ecm into thinking its load is slightly higher than actual?
 

OR VietVet

Multnomah Falls
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
21,201
Reaction score
37,987
Location
Willamette Valley
when I cleaned mine, it looked more like black oily stuff. like it came firm the pvc system or intake than anything that could come thru the air filter. but yeah, makes sense if you say over oil a k&n style.
I really do not see the draw of the K&N filter.
 
OP
OP
H

hagar

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Posts
228
Reaction score
208
So, is it a good idea to try to 'trick' the ecm into thinking its load is slightly higher than actual?
I personally set the tranny tunes up so they don't go below a certain shift torque factor setting. There is a lot of room in the part throttle shifting range to make things more aggressive, without making the shifts annoying. The benefit is not only better shift feel, but tranny longevity by getting the trans in and out of gear quicker, and with less slip time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
133,327
Posts
1,883,644
Members
98,402
Latest member
SPIS
Top