Adaptive Cruise Control

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

smittydog

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Posts
62
Reaction score
0
I like my adaptive cruise control...but I have found a concern/flaw. (I have previous experience with adaptive cruise control on my 11 Jeep GC)

So, when I am driving on AA highway, there are some moderate curves, (nothing hairpin mind you). When I have the ACC on and we enter a curve (with a car or semi in the outside lane) the ACC will try and stop the Yukon (we are in the inside lane). It seems the ACC can't separate the lanes and detect the different trajectories of the vehicles-and that we are in different lanes. A minor annoyance but I hope GM will do a software upgrade to fix this issue.

I do love the ACC system...It was one of the reasons for my purchase of the 15 Yukon.
 

humer101

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Posts
1,278
Reaction score
221
Location
NJ,USA
Yes it is you right but beside that works pretty good

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
 

rgpie75

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Posts
34
Reaction score
2
Does it work in slow traffic as well? I sit in a lot of stop and go traffic during rush hour and would definitely be worth the cost if I didn't constantly have to hit the brakes.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
 

livingez_123

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Posts
1,798
Reaction score
112
Location
Sandy, OR
Does it work in slow traffic as well? I sit in a lot of stop and go traffic during rush hour and would definitely be worth the cost if I didn't constantly have to hit the brakes.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

I would hope not, I don't think you can set the cruise under 35mph, now your just being lazy.

That would be one interesting court case to watch play out.
 

smittydog

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Posts
62
Reaction score
0
No, it's not for stop and go traffic. Not designed to work in stop and go situation.
 

rgpie75

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Posts
34
Reaction score
2
I can't argue that I'm not lazy :) I asked because I thought I read somewhere that the system in the new Dodge Durango worked in stop and go traffic and would actually bring the car to a stop. But in addition to being lazy my memory sucks so I could be wrong.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
 

AWSMBLU

Full Access Member
Joined
May 7, 2014
Posts
175
Reaction score
46
Hi it even states that in the Manual about usind ACC and drivind around Curves.
 

kcwood247

TYF Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2014
Posts
10
Reaction score
0
I've tested (during test drives) multiple vehicles with adaptive cruise control, and the 2015 Yukon Denali is the 3rd vehicle I've owned with it. Adaptive cruise control, unless you exclusively drive on a farm or curvy country back roads, is definitely worth it. When my wife and I make a list of features for our vehicles, it is a "must have" with no exception. We both use it daily.

(As a side note, these vehicles, with adaptive cruise to 0 mph, lane departure assist, auto windshield wipers, automatic high beams (which GM missed on these), etc., really are starting to drive themselves. Obviously you can turn these features off when you want in case you forget what it's like to drive.)

In regards to GM's implementation of adaptive cruise control, my wife and I love having adaptive cruise control and wouldn't have it any other way, but we both agree that GMs is by far the worst we've owned. I know there's a lot of other factors to consider for a near 3 ton vehicle, but they just missed the boat on a few things. We're hoping GM can fix with some software updates. Guess only time will tell. Here are the specifics:
- Inconsistent distance. Near, Medium, and Far do not equate to anything we can tell in the logic (i.e., time (ex. 1 sec, 3 sec, 5 sec), distance (ex. 15 feet, 30 feet, 45 feet), or a formula of the either time or distance based on current speed. Whichever vehicle we're driving we typically have it set to the middle setting. Unless in mid to thick traffic, then we (I know this sounds bad) set it to near. If we don't then people (who don't have or understand adaptive cruise) think we're the slow one and pass on the right. It seems like the Yukon Denali just can't get the distance to be consistent. It's seems like when traffic slows, you come up way too fast before the system kicks in. We still haven't gotten used to this and still hover our foot over the brake as we don't quite completely trust it yet. We've never felt like this in our other vehicles, even from day 1. Along the same lines, it's like the system then inserts a delay (like a second or two) when traffic picks back up before it decides to start accelerating again.
- (I have some pretty big heartburn on this one.). When you override the system by manually accelerating over the set cruise speed and then let off the gas, it does a hard brake to get you back to the set speed. This is really annoying. No other manufacturer that I know of does this. They simply let the vehicle "coast" back to the set speed. For instance (using some legal speeds)...You have your cruise set at 55, you come up on a car going 45, you follow for a while until you get to passing zone, then you pass. During the pass you go 65 (assuming it was a two lane road and it's not a long passing zone). As soon as you complete the pass, you're still going 65 so you let off the gas. At this point the Yukon does a hard brake to 55, then starts cruising as normal. If for some reason you ended up going 70 or 75 during the pass, it's noticeable enough that our 2.5 year old asks if something is wrong with the Yukon. We get a chuckle out of it though.

The best system we test drove and ultimately own is on the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. They got it right for keeping a consistent distance, accurate detection (it does have false positives from time to time but that's expected on any of these systems), and intuitive use.
Our 2013 Audi S4 is very good but not as nice as the JGC. There aren't any steering wheel controls (isn't any room due to the S4 smaller steering wheel/style) - instead it's integrated on one of the levers, it doesn't ease (brake and accelerate) as smoothly as the JGC, and when adjusting the speed it does so in increments/decrements of 2.5mph.
We're a tad nit picky, but having an adaptive cruise control system far outweighs not having it.

As for stop & go (i.e., all the way to zero, and then start back up by pressing the gas or pressing resume (depending on manufacturer)), is starting to become more common, especially for those vehicles that already have had an adaptive cruise system. And yes, the current JGC and Dodge Durangos do have stop & go.
 
Last edited:

hosseface

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Posts
794
Reaction score
106
I've tested (during test drives) multiple vehicles with adaptive cruise control, and the 2015 Yukon Denali is the 3rd vehicle I've owned with it. Active cruise control, unless you exclusively drive on a farm or curvy country back roads, is definitely worth it. When my wife and I make a list of features for our vehicles, it is a "must have" with no exception. We both use it daily.

(As a side note, these vehicles, with adaptive cruise to 0 mph, lane departure assist, auto windshield wipers, automatic high beams (which GM missed on these), etc., really are starting to drive themselves. Obviously you can turn these features off when you want in case you forget what it's like to drive.)

In regards to GM's implementation of adaptive cruise control, my wife and I love having adaptive cruise control and wouldn't have it any other way, but we both agree that GMs is by far the worst we've owned. I know there's a lot of other factors to consider for a near 3 ton vehicle, but they just missed the boat on a few things. We're hoping GM can fix with some software updates. Guess only time will tell. Here are the specifics:
- Inconsistent distance. Near, Medium, and Far do not equate to anything we can tell in the logic (i.e., time (ex. 1 sec, 3 sec, 5 sec), distance (ex. 15 feet, 30 feet, 45 feet), or a formula of the either time or distance based on current speed. Whichever vehicle we're driving we typically have it set to the middle setting. Unless in mid to thick traffic, then we (I know this sounds bad) set it to near. If we don't then people (who don't have or understand adaptive cruise) think we're the slow one and pass on the right. It seems like the Yukon Denali just can't get the distance to be consistent. It's seems like when traffic slows, you come up way too fast before the system kicks in. We still haven't gotten used to this and still hover our foot over the brake as we don't quite completely trust it yet. We've never felt like this in our other vehicles, even from day 1. Along the same lines, it's like the system then inserts a delay (like a second or two) when traffic picks back up before it decides to start accelerating again.
- (I have some pretty big heartburn on this one.). When you override the system by manually accelerating over the set cruise speed and then let off the gas, it does a hard brake to get you back to the set speed. This is really annoying. No other manufacturer that I know if does this. They simply let the vehicle "coast" back to the set speed. For instance (using some legal speeds)...You have your cruise set at 55, you come up on a car going 45, you follow for a while until you get to passing zone, then you pass. During the pass you go 65 (assuming it was a two lane road and it's not a long passing zone). As soon as you complete the pass, you're still going 65 so you let off the gas. At this point the Yukon does a hard brake to 55, then starts cruising as normal. If for some reason you ended up going 70 or 75 during the pass, it's noticeable enough that our 2.5 year old asks if something is wrong with the Yukon. We get a chuckle out of it though.

The best system we test drove and ultimately own is on the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. They got it right for keeping a consistent distance, accurate detection (it does have false positives from time to time but that's expected on any of these systems), and intuitive use.
Our 2013 Audi S4 is very good but not as nice as the JGC. There isn't any steering wheel controls (isn't any room due to the S4 smaller steering wheel/style) - instead it's integrated on one of the levers, it does ease (brake and accelerate) as smoothly as the JGC, and when adjusting the speed it does so in increments/decrements of 2.5mph.
We're a tad nit picky, but having an adaptive cruise control system far outweighs not having it.

As for stop & go (i.e., all the way to zero, and then start back up by pressing the gas or pressing resume (depending on manufacturer)), is starting to become more common, especially for those vehicles that have already had an adaptive cruise system previously. And yes, the current JGC and Dodge Durangos do have stop & go.

Nice post. Great info. Thanks.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,219
Posts
1,864,180
Members
96,751
Latest member
Lopezdad
Top