Antonm
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2024
- Posts
- 338
- Reaction score
- 356
The truth of something isn't proportional to the square of word count.
Power is torque times rpm.
Torque is proportional to square of bore size.
Torque equation doesn't have rpm in it.
6.2 will make more torque than 5.3 at same afr.
You still don't understand / can't see what the equation you're trying to use is telling you.
If I' understanding you right, you think at the below referenced torque equation proves that as you say "6.2 will make more torque than 5.3 at same afr."
But, like the clueless guy you are , you failed (again) to recognize that the equation you are using has a term for Pressure at bottom dead center.
And as we've already discussed and proven, if a 5.3 and a 6.2 take in the same quantity of air, the the pressure a BTC will be higher in the 5.3 (that's the whole jist of the scientific law you think doesn't work for some strange reason).
So lets look at how the terms would change (in your own equation) if you inject the same amount of fuel (which requires the same amount of air to maintain the same afr) in a larger bore engine .
Look a that, torque stays the same, wow.
For torque to go up , then pressure a BTC would have to stay the same (or go up), which would mean more air is in the cylinder than compared to the 5.3, which would require more fuel to maintain the same afr,,,,, and so,,, wow, more fuel would cause torque to go up,,,, its like power comes from the fuel or something.
And really, even without the equations (that you obviously can't read/ don't understand what the hell they're telling you), did you really think that just increasing bore size would make power go up without burning more fuel? If so, that would solve all the worlds energy issues, because we could just make bigger and bigger bore engines, use the same fuel and get more power.
...
Last edited: