Disable AFM

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Joseph Garcia

Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
7,786
Reaction score
10,738
Interesting. Who knew? Could be a good way to temporarily eliminate DFM functionality, while waiting or preparing physical work for its complete elimination.
 

DontTaseMeBro

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Posts
309
Reaction score
207
Interesting. Who knew? Could be a good way to temporarily eliminate DFM functionality, while waiting or preparing physical work for its complete elimination.
Joe, it’s been well documented across multiple threads in this sub-forum.

Take this one for example:
 

Joseph Garcia

Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
7,786
Reaction score
10,738
Joe, it’s been well documented across multiple threads in this sub-forum.

Take this one for example:
It was news to me, so it may be news to others. I don't know all of the answers, and I look forward to learning something new every day.
 

RG23RST

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Posts
41
Reaction score
35
Yes that's been a thing even going back to the 6 speed units a decade ago.

It "shouldn't" hurt anything but at the same time I'm not sure I would guinea pig myself for 100K miles running on the highway in 9th gear with the E clutch applied. Probably a non-issue though.
 

PPV_2018

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2024
Posts
176
Reaction score
303
Location
U.S.A.
Yep same as running in M5 with the 6-speeds.

Well, the EPA will no longer enforce the Clean Air Act and GM and the others will likely get rid of AFM from new production engines soon enough.
Yeah i wouldn’t count on that. I can’t see gm deleting afm from future production considering the possibility of the next U.S. administration reinstating tighter emissions rules. That would cost gm lotsa “zeros” whereas it would be cheaper for them just to keep this already established “technology” under the guise of saving you, the consumer, money on fuel.



At any rate, this thread should be a sticky, for those who are unaware.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
20,088
Reaction score
27,350
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Yeah i wouldn’t count on that. I can’t see gm deleting afm from future production considering the possibility of the next U.S. administration reinstating tighter emissions rules. That would cost gm lotsa “zeros” whereas it would be cheaper for them just to keep this already established “technology” under the guise of saving you, the consumer, money on fuel.



At any rate, this thread should be a sticky, for those who are unaware.

Or they could delete it and offer vehicles for less money while increasing their profits. We shall see.
 

RG23RST

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Posts
41
Reaction score
35
N
Yep same as running in M5 with the 6-speeds.

Well, the EPA will no longer enforce the Clean Air Act and GM and the others will likely get rid of AFM from new production engines soon enough.
Not how that works. CAA is Congressional legislation and isn't going anywhere. GM gets the 5.3 to ULEV50 with DFM and they sell that engine in other markets so there's no point in having multiple versions. Whichever way GM wants to meet the law is up to them. Big gov doesn't require cylinder deactivation but it helps meet the target. Ford went the opposite route for their volume engines (2.7 and 3.5) with smaller displacement and sell relatively few V8s now even though those have cylinder deactivation too.

What little has trickled down to us concerning the new engines for 27/28 indicates they'll still employ the deactivation technology along with cooled EGR which has been on the Ford stuff for a few years now. That's secondhand information from the bosses that attend dealer shows so take it for what it's worth.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
133,667
Posts
1,889,126
Members
98,919
Latest member
gknowels
Top