Expedition vs Yukon

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Polo08816

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
764
Reaction score
314
I like that guys videos.
My one criticism for Youtube reviews is I honestly don't care for someone going into extensive detail describing the exterior. People are going to think what they are going to think and it isn't going to change their mind. Also, most people are not blind.

I'd rather they tell me about all the things I can't easily see about the car.
 

Polo08816

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
764
Reaction score
314

Here's a new review by Straight Pipes. Looks like there is reason to avoid the 15" screen.
 

Polo08816

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
764
Reaction score
314
Video review of the 2023 Toyota Sequoia towing a lighter trailer. I'm not a fan of the Sequoia rear cargo area storage. Although I would be interested to see if Toyota decides to develop a long wheel base version to better compete with the Expedition Max, Suburban/Yukon XL, and Wagoneer L. I would also prefer it in a non-hybrid configuration.

 

bunky319

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2022
Posts
229
Reaction score
142
Video review of the 2023 Toyota Sequoia towing a lighter trailer. I'm not a fan of the Sequoia rear cargo area storage. Although I would be interested to see if Toyota decides to develop a long wheel base version to better compete with the Expedition Max, Suburban/Yukon XL, and Wagoneer L. I would also prefer it in a non-hybrid configuration.

Interesting...Yes, they would have to offer an XL version before I'd even consider it....also...don't these have solid rear axles? Not sure that's a good thing for everyday driving.
 

Polo08816

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
764
Reaction score
314
Interesting...Yes, they would have to offer an XL version before I'd even consider it....also...don't these have solid rear axles? Not sure that's a good thing for everyday driving.
These do have solid rear axles which can be more appropriate for towing. However, they don't ride as well as IRS. I'm not sure I would go as far as to say they are not good for everyday driving. Almost all half ton pickups as well as the previous generation GM full size SUVs use solid rear axles and are used for everyday driving. I would prefer IRS in a full size SUV unless it's a 3/4 ton full size SUV (which doesn't exist currently).
 
Last edited:

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,611
Reaction score
26,327
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
These do have solid rear axles which can be more appropriate for towing. However, they don't ride as well as IRS. I'm not sure I would go as far as to say they are not good for everyday driving. Almost all half ton pickups as well as the previous generation GM full size SUVs use solid rear axles and are used for everyday driving. I would prefer IRS in a full size SUV unless it's a 3/4 ton full size SUV (which doesn't exist currently).

You can have a great ride with a solid axle, the main benefit to using an IRS is the increased depth of the cabin back there making the 3rd row more comfortable for taller persons.
 

Polo08816

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
764
Reaction score
314
Looks like Jeep sales of the Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer have increased by a significant percentage from 2022 Q1 to 2022 Q2.

Wagoneer
Q1: 7,056
Q2: 10,221
Delta: +45%

Grand Wagoneer
Q1: 3,169
Q2: 3,932
Delta: +24%

I wouldn't be surprised if they were selling 30,000+ units per year once the L models are introduced and the supply chain has recovered somewhat.


Ford needs to get it together. Here are their Expedition sales.

2022 Q1: 9,718
2022 Q2: 6,436
Delta: -34%


I don't think GM has reported sales yet.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
132,369
Posts
1,866,892
Members
96,996
Latest member
Brynedic
Top