Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
The amount of peak horsepower you can get with the VVT cam is rather limited. A non BBT cam really opened the door up for higher horsepower. Generally as you add more horsepower with those cams, the power band is up high, and you lose the low end torque. The VVT.... Wether in an l92 without AFM or an old 94 with it.... Both make roughly 408 horsepower with lots of torque right off idle. It's sort of a compromise for driveability reasons. The best way to get the best of both worlds is with more displacement. Such as a 408 cubic inch stroker. There's so many choices in so many variables, it really does depend on what each person wants to use it for. For my wife's commuter and grocery getter, it's more than she'll ever need or use. (She gave it 3/4 throttle getting on the freeway and actually scared herself, LOL)
And if it's destined to be a family car, you might want to consider reliability. You start putting more lift on those valve springs, more pressure on the cam, result in a shorter overall engine life. But that's not a concern for someone after sheer horsepower.
This is generally true, but truck cams are optimized for lower end power production. But of course there is significant variation between them in how well they do it. I ran 3 different "truck cam" grinds. One from Vinci, one from BTR, and the Cam Motion I have in there now, and it's superior to the others in both drivability and power output through the range. I chalk it up to the fact that Cam Motion sells a grind of each of their cams that's specific to the engine it's going into, taking advantage of the unique flow characteristics of the heads, etc. The others were ground as a compromise so they would "work" in the 4.8, 5.3, 6.0 & 6.2.Generally as you add more horsepower with those cams, the power band is up high, and you lose the low end torque.
Probably so, but there is precious little information out there with which to assess the tradeoffs between performance and probable durability, so folks like me end up choosing something in the middle that doesn't seem to push the limits too much. The lift on the Cam Motion cam is .553/.553 so I went with springs designed to handle the higher lift and did a trunnion upgrade, though the latter probably wasn't necessary. Stock is .500/.500 but lots of guys are running cams with .601/.601 lift from TSP and others. I was afraid to go that high because I had no way to assess the impact on durability, even with dual springs.You start putting more lift on those valve springs, more pressure on the cam, result in a shorter overall engine life. But that's not a concern for someone after sheer horsepower.
On a side note, as it sounds like you're leaning towards keeping the AFM working.... The root cause of most failures is that VLOM manifold with the solenoids in it. Specifically it's usually one of those solenoids. One malfunctions, directs a lifter to do what it shouldn't do at the wrong time, and you have major engine damage. So if you're going to keep it it's probably good idea to go ahead and replace it, which should help somewhat with oil pressure as well as a preventative measure against a catastrophic failure. Even if you use one of the inexpensive devices that plugs into the OBD2 port to disable it, I would go ahead and replace it to address oil pressure issues. The genuine GM is about $260 on RockAuto. They also have one made by Dorman that supposedly is improved somehow, for about $180. I've got no experience or knowledge about the Dorman unit. The GM one, at least you know it's lasted however many miles you have right now.
When you're putting it back together, make sure you put a new screen in the hole where the oil pressure sending unit goes. And you might consider looking online, there's several sending unit relocation kits that move the sending unit to the end of a steel braided hose that you can wire tie up on the firewall. That makes it convenient way to swap in a mechanical gauge to verify pressures, and then just reinstall the OEM sending unit. Also makes future changes in checks a 5-minute ordeal.
And don't be surprised if you find half or more of the bolts securing the VLOM down loose. As in not even finger tight. That's pretty common. On assembly, a little bit of blue loctite on the threads will take care of that.
I told my wife about this and she died laughing. It was even funnier when she realized it wasn’t about a random forum and it was about our YukonNow you get to explain to your other half about the long list of stuff...."while we are in there"
Make sure you use the word 'we' so she feels part of everything
New water pump, serpentine belt, the pulley and tensioner, new hoses. Lol, everything is connected to something so the list is as long as you want to make it. Knowing when to stop is the most difficult thing!
“We” need to order partsLol
Yes, the VLOM can be responsible for huge oil leaks. First off, it's pretty typical to find several of the bolts that hold it down barely finger tight. And it has to seal down against towers that have oil coming up through them.
It's also pretty common in your OEM oil pump, for the relief valve to get weak and bleed off oil at too low of a pressure, or to get a buildup of sludge and crud that interferes with its operation. Another good reason to go in for that timing chain, since the oil pump has to come off anyway.
"We" need to order some parts![]()