IS AFM DISABLEMENT NECESSARY??

[Gearz]

I have had Range Technology AFM delete for 10 years and I won't drive the truck without it especially having dual exhaust the sound is just terrible in V4 mode. V8 power all the way!

 

[IEATZ28]

You have asked a question that many have asked before. I’ve decided after 8 years of owning vehicles with the AFM that the question is unanswerable because no one can predict the future. I sold our 2011 Suburban with 160k miles and bought a newer Escalade trying to avoid lifter failure due to the high mileage. Well, 6 months/12k miles into ownership I ended up with a stuck lifter and a bent push rod on the newer vehicle. I plan to write a post about it at some point. Lessons to be learned in the whole process.

 

[Marky Dissod]

... I’ve decided after 8 years of owning vehicles with the AFM that the question is unanswerable because no one can predict the future ...

With 100% accuracy for each specific iteration? No, of course not.
But this is like saying, maybe I don't need to wear my seat belt, it might not save my life at anytime during this specific drive.
Frankly, the seat belt has NEVER protected me ... so far ...

Disabling Engine Half@$$ does not guarantee that the two mode lifters will not fail in the future.
Leaving Engine Half@$$ on does not guarantee that the two mode lifters MUST fail in the future.

HOWEVER
Disabling Engine Half@$$, even with just a plug-in, WILL extend the serviceable life of the TCC (can't tell you by how much, I'm not psychic),
and WILL improve the odds that your two-mode lifters will last longer.
Please note that changing motor oil sooner / more often than GM's OLM suggests also helps; how much sooner / more often is up to you.

Which brings me to my next point:

... bought a newer Escalade trying to avoid lifter failure due to the high mileage.
Well, 6 months/12k miles into ownership I ended up with a stuck lifter and a bent push rod on the newer vehicle.

And you don't blame the previous owner at all, whatsoever?

 

[PatDTN]

Here's my opinion (all of these responses are opinions.) I had a problem with my stock 5.3 when it suddenly started guzzling oil and got the same list of responses. I bought a junkyard 6.2 from a newer Yukon and went through the physical process of blocking off the oil passages to the odd lifters, buying all new lifters, an LS9 cam with all new valve springs and valve guide seals. I went through the engine while I was at it and replaced the oil pump pickup O-ring which was clearly failed cleaned up some stuff etc.

I dropped that engine in and after struggling through tuning for the new engine and loss of AFM experienced the same symptoms with the new engine. I came to find out both upper catalytic converters had failed, collapsed, and blocked the third cat downstream leaving nowhere to get the exhaust out. That pushed the oil up into my intake.

I replaced the Y pipe with new cats and things have been fine.

Based on the enormous number of engines on the road with AFM I think the number of failures must be a very low percentage. Keeping the oil changes up to date, using a quality oil (don't use diesel oil if you have cats because diesels use zinc in the oil that destroys cats) and generally keeping things clean will almost certainly keep your AFM alive and well.

When I had it working I never felt the change between 4 and 8 cylinders.

The 6.2 is a blast with the LS9 cam but uses premium fuel at an alarming rate. So much so that I'm probably going to sell the Tahoe soon. I love the truck, I hate the fuel cost.

 

[IEATZ28]

With 100% accuracy for each specific iteration? No, of course not.
But this is like saying, maybe I don't need to wear my seat belt, it might not save my life at anytime during this specific drive.
Frankly, the seat belt has NEVER protected me ... so far ...

Disabling Engine Half@$$ does not guarantee that the two mode lifters will not fail in the future.
Leaving Engine Half@$$ on does not guarantee that the two mode lifters MUST fail in the future.

HOWEVER
Disabling Engine Half@$$, even with just a plug-in, WILL extend the serviceable life of the TCC (can't tell you by how much, I'm not psychic),
and WILL improve the odds that your two-mode lifters will last longer.
Please note that changing motor oil sooner / more often than GM's OLM suggests also helps; how much sooner / more often is up to you.

Which brings me to my next point:

And you don't blame the previous owner at all, whatsoever?

I don’t. He took great care of the vehicle, and it had good service records from the dealer. I believe it sat too much in the last year, and that resulted in the issue. The oil hadn’t been changed in almost a year when I bought it, but that was because it had only been driven 300 miles in the last year.

 

[intergalactron]

I drove a 2013 Silverado for 3 years and about 75,000 miles with a disabler. Maybe more. Then when they lifter noise got too excessive, I did a full-on AMF delete with a new cam and lifters. Never missed the AFM either way.

 

[Marky Dissod]

it sat too much in the last year, and that resulted in the issue.
The oil hadn’t been changed in almost a year when I bought it, but that was because it had only been driven 300 miles in the last year.

So, in AFM's OPINION, was it that the oil hadn't been changed in almost a year,
or
that it had only been driven 300 miles in the last year,
that was grounds for one of your lifters failing you?

... Or was it GM? ...