iamdub
Full Access Member
I think the exhaust is holding me back quite a bit. I have the suitcase + the stock resonator, which reduces the pipe diameter there at the tailpipe.
I'm also a bit skeptical of this intake tube. If you look closely at the pic, you can see how the tube extends really far into the elbow, almost like a kink. The analogy would be like mandrel bent exhaust vs non-mandrel bent. Actually, the rubber elbow itself is kinked like this, so it gets narrow at the bend.
Byron, correct.
Again, my shift points are too high for my setup. There is a couple hundred RPM of "not much" at the top of each gear.
One thing I should add is that my times were shockingly consistent. I mean, all the way down the time slip, the numbers were basically the same on every pass.
I wouldn't focus so much on that reduced diameter at the very back. This is by design. By the time the exhaust has made it through the cats, muffler and all the piping, it has cooled considerably. The smaller diameter pipe after the muffler helps to maintain the speed of the exhaust gases to maintain evacuation.
Until you're moving considerably more air (FI, boost or cam), I'd throw a straight-through muffler on it and let 'er rip.
The MIT does flare out then tapers back to the size of the TB inlet. So, maybe there is something to be said for that versus the tube you have. Running consistent times and being a quick swap, you could put the stock duct or another tube back in between runs and see if there's any notable difference. FWIW, the MIT was shown to yield around 6-8 HP on the top end. Likely nothing you'd notice.