thompsoj22
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2018
- Posts
- 689
- Reaction score
- 717
i would not use E series acdelco they use cardboard
so if you want a cardboard soup in your engine then go for it
I should put one in and have a cardboard soup then GM buys me a new engine for free.. (or it might blow apart from the HIGH pressure )
I can keep putting it in then get unlimited free engines once every 3,000 miles[/QUOT
1969 Vietnam, 21 Naval Regiment, NMCB-1 Alpha company, 7th platoon. I was an operator and we all got to set down after work to drink beer and shot the S*&T with the mechanics at the EM club. Great guys and these guys did mostly high end diesel engines, but some of the lighter equipment was gas powered. I had one friend, Bobby Rhodes, and what he could do to the Volkswagen engine was truly amazing, and back in the sixties, turbos where only in the Diesel engines for the most part. And Oil pressure is the result of volume after the oil filter, a high volume oil pump will give higher PSI. And I didn't say Mobil-1 isn't good, it is. I had a LS1 in a 2003 Corvette, and if I had one guy mention the valve tap in their LS1, I must of had 30 of them mention it. It wasn't a valve tap, but piston slap. It's really harmless, it only happens when the engine is cold and only lasts about 60 seconds after start. Mobil-1 5W/30 was the oil of choice by GM back then and it was great oil, never let anyone I knew, but I have run across a few tests showing maybe Pennzoil might be a little better? And WIX filters have always been top shelf since I cut my teeth on engines in 1967. But engines today have very little to do with modern engines. The engineering and manufacture is so good today that they have almost nothing to do with 40 year old engines. However, the Ford 3 valve triton engine is a and will forever be a sad low point for the brand. This is engineering gone wrong from the get-go. And GM's AFM or DFM are running a close second. i Engineering and installing valve lifters, a Integral Engine part that run the very good chance of coming apart in the engines lifetime is very very sad point. So many of today's top brand engines have become "Throw-Away" engines and are a stain on automotive engineers everywhere. In aviation this would never be allowed, any doubt, would seal it's fate. And I don't want to rant, so please excuse me, but if the EPA WANTED clean air, they would and should start with Power Plants and Aviation. Since I live fairly close to a Major airport I promise you, you would not believe how much pollution a Jet engine puts out and multiply it by 45.000 roughly, the number of fights a day, and you get the picture. The EPA always comes after the domestic automobile market, and it is because we are defenseless, low-hanging fruit as we are known in our society. That's not leadership, it's just underhandedness and fraud.
the new heavy's are becoming super effecient! most airlines are going to the new engines as they are leased hi bypass fan technology. google air bus/rolls royce/boeing their all onboard. I gotta be honest, when im on the beach in some exotic destination i couldent give a crap less about emissions to get me there!lol