This could get interesting and may give GM some wiggle room. We shall see what happens.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Step in the right direction.This could get interesting and may give GM some wiggle room. We shall see what happens.
It may loosen up what GM and other manufacturers could do with making minor changes in ECM programming, part or featue disabling something like configuring the Auto Stop/Start to remember the last setting when the engine is shut off. Remomber during the "Chip Shortage" I think some of these trucks did not have the modules to operate the Auto Stop/Start and possibly the DFM system!Step in the right direction.
But what does it change for the current vehicles? GM can change oil recommendation? Release a standard warrantied AFM/DFM delete?
100% we would…I think most of us here would take a 1-2 MPG hit if it meant the engine could last 200,000+ miles without lifter, camshaft and bearing failures.
How do you record your more advanced data, such as live pressure?Not sure there are any tigher tolerances, just look at the "Lifter Bore" problem. These engines are not far from the 6.0l from 20 years ago, just with a bunch of crap hung on them. Some of the crap does wonders, well we know about the rest
Really an issue of bearing surface pressures and also oil retension when the engine is turned off. Higher viscosity oil will not "squeeze" as much as a lower viscostity oil, there is a lot of crazy physics, but the best way I can maybe describe it is higher viscosity oil has a higher surface tension (might not be the best way, but may help visualize a bit).
The other BIG problem is with fuel dilution of the engine oil. DI engines have a fair amount of fuel dilution issues by nature/design, I am sure Auto Stop/Start does not help, I am sure DFM may not help either. Remote starting to allow the engine to warn up at idle is also not good. As fuel dilutes the engine oil, the viscosity drops. So what you take out of the engine at an oil change is not what is going in as fresh oil.
So you start with a thin oil that may be bordeline for the application (Safety margins are good, not enough safety margin, well what can I say), then add fuel, once you add fuel, the oil consumption increases, if you have oil consumption and do not check the oil, the fuel concentration increases as the oil level drops, use the Remote Start feature too often (especially in the Winter and allow the engine to warm up 15 minutes, this is NO BUENO!!) the longer you wait between oil changes, the more fuel dilution. It is just a vicious cycle.
I have to do some testing, but the oil cooler may do great things, but it may also cause the oil to hold more fuel due to less "Cook Off". If the oil runs too cool, especially in the Winter months this could add to less fuel being "Cooked Off" during engine operation. Short trips in the Winter months are also a problem. Back many years ago, had an older lady making a lot of short trips in the Winter. The muffler became layered up with condesation until the engine would not start because the muffler was full of ice! I could just guess what the oil was like. Just an interesting example of what short trips in cold temps can cause.
Anyway, I do not expect to see any movement in the 6.2l for a solution for probably 6 months at the earliest unless the numbes are catastrophically high. A little mixing of the numbers and precentages and maybe they explain away the failures as trivial. Who knows, we may be having these same discussions years from now even with the 2025 6.2l??
I am not waiting on answers or solutions, I am doing what I can in my power to hopefully extend the life of my engine.