Used high mileage Yukon vs Tahoe

[Kgee]

x2 on the inspection. Check them out in person first, rule out any that aren't what you want, and have the target of your affection go through a pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic.

EDIT: the inspection will give you some negotiating points.

Fasure will do

 

[Kgee]

Make sure to have it checked out from top to bottom by a good independent mechanic and try to get service records. I do not have a issue with high mileage vehicles as long as it was serviced regularly.

Okay so I should put my interest into well taking care of high mileage truck and save a few thousand for future issues.. Or just go for low mileage pay high price and hope the trans & engine is healthy because of miles

 

[Kgee]

If you have not driven them then that would be the first thing I would do. Check overall condition and see if there are any problems. Take your time, look at interior, exterior, all knobs buttons, tires, brakes, check them with a fine tooth comb and make sure everything works. I would then pick out the one I liked best.

I test drove the 08 Yukon @193k miles it’s super clean inside out and drives so smooth and strong that’s the pro, just don’t know how much life the Engine & Transmission has.. Car came from auction so Service records are not on hand .. I test drive the other 2 later today

 

[Kgee]

You don't want the 5.3L. Oil consumption is pretty much a guarantee due to the crappy piston rings they used unless you can find one that had the pistons replaced. Get the 6.2L in a Denali or Escalade. They don't even have AFM in 07-09 so that significantly reduces the possibility of lifter failure (they can still pit the roller or cam surface) but the 6.2L didn't get the low tension rings and therefore had significantly less oil consumption issues. Yes, the 6.2L has terrible fuel economy and needs Premium but that's a small price to pay to avoid the oil consumption issues of the 5.3L which will need new pistons and rings to fix at a minimum cost of $5k.

So basically just look for a 08 - 13 Yukon Denali ?? And exit the others out ?

 

[Fless]

Not these days it won’t. They’ll tell you to hit the road because they know the next guy will probably buy it.

Even if you can't negotiate, you'll have a better idea of the condition of the truck. Not all of us are intimately familiar with what to look for, or capable of more than a cursory inspection, and this would allow one to make an educated buy.

 

[Kgee]

Even if you can't negotiate, you'll have a better idea of the condition of the truck. Not all of us are intimately familiar with what to look for, or capable of more than a cursory inspection, and this would allow one to make an educated buy.

I agree , Just came across 2013 Yukon Denali 133k miles 2nd owner he wants $15k ?? Is that fair price

 

[Kgee]

You don't want the 5.3L. Oil consumption is pretty much a guarantee due to the crappy piston rings they used unless you can find one that had the pistons replaced. Get the 6.2L in a Denali or Escalade. They don't even have AFM in 07-09 so that significantly reduces the possibility of lifter failure (they can still pit the roller or cam surface) but the 6.2L didn't get the low tension rings and therefore had significantly less oil consumption issues. Yes, the 6.2L has terrible fuel economy and needs Premium but that's a small price to pay to avoid the oil consumption issues of the 5.3L which will need new pistons and rings to fix at a minimum cost of $5k.

Yea I agree , So Just came across 2013 Yukon Denali 133k miles 2nd owner he wants $15k ?? Is that fair price

 

[Joseph Garcia]

Welcome to the Forum from NH.

Lots of knowledgeable folks here who freely share their knowledge, experiences, and perspectives. Knowledge is power.

I hope that you will become a participating member in the Forum's discussions.

Pics of the truck, please.

You are already receiving sage advice from the knowledgeable folks on this Forum.

 

[Miami-Dade]

Okay so I should put my interest into well taking care of high mileage truck and save a few thousand for future issues.. Or just go for low mileage pay high price and hope the trans & engine is healthy because of miles

I would not pay a very high price for a low mileage Tahoe-Yukon. But that is me. To each their own.

Right now I have 139K miles on my 16 Tahoe and have zero intentions of selling it for a long time to come and I take a lot of long trips. I was offered 27K bucks recently for it but turned it down quickly.

I have seen people right here on this forum sell their vehicles for a lower mileage one. Then they find out soon after that their higher mileage one was better.

 

[phlorentz]

Hello I’m new to this forum. Also this will be my first time owning a SUV. I’ve had my eye on 2 trucks one being 2008 Yukon Slt 2wd fully loaded moon roof captain seats etc 5.3 motor @ 193k miles Dealer wants $10k
Also I found a 2010 Tahoe Lt Leather seats 2nd row Bench seat No moonroof @ 160k miles $10k Private Firm on price
Also 2008 Yukon Denali 6.2 motor fully loaded with Goodies @177k miles dealer wants $10k … Which one should I consider I am on the west coast prices are high for these Tahoe & yukon

High mileage?? I have 270,000 on my ‘98 5.7 that bought in’ 99. No intention of selling it. Low oil pressure with 10/30 but good with 10/40 which should not be a problem in Florida anyway. Does not burn any oil between changes.