Useless Information

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
swathdiver

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,815
Reaction score
26,762
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Man with all the up and down hills bere I’m at 14.3 MPG average. But thats with my cam and leveling kit so I’m not doing too bad. Do you have the 4 speed or 6 speed?
Edit: turning phone sideways shows ur sig, which states 6 speed.

can you upload that spreadsheet?

14.3 MPG is the average for ALL variations of the GMT900 SUVs, long and short, first year to last save for Hybrids.

Upload it to where? Send me an email, I'll clean up the file and send it over.
 

Big Mama

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Posts
3,424
Reaction score
2,112
Location
Virginia
this one. I don’t have flex so I’m wondering if you fill up with different types of gas. Interesting

That tank had a remnant of 5 gallons of 96octane mixed fuel along with 4 gallons ofE85 and 22 gallons of Unleaded 88/E15.
 

Thauber

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
48
Reaction score
35
Location
Columbus, GA
14.3 MPG is the average for ALL variations of the GMT900 SUVs, long and short, first year to last save for Hybrids.

Upload it to where? Send me an email, I'll clean up the file and send it over.
Interesting, I would have assumed it would have been better than the NBS being these have the 6-speed tranny. Known reason for the low mpg?
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
7,124
Reaction score
14,365
Location
St. Louis
Does a leveling kit affect mileage?

2001 Yukon SLT
2012 Yukon Denali XL
2011 Yukon Denali RIP 5/20/18
 

Thauber

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
48
Reaction score
35
Location
Columbus, GA
Could be that they’re heavier, bigger, and more powerful.
Compared my '04 to an '09 equivalent. The nnbs is only 300 lbs heavier, 15 more HP, and 5 more torque. Extremely minimal difference.
Is it maybe tied with the use of E85? Mine is a flex as well, but I only use plain old 87 octane.
 

Sam Harris

Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Posts
7,431
Reaction score
14,926
Location
Texas
Compared my '04 to an '09 equivalent. The nnbs is only 300 lbs heavier, 15 more HP, and 5 more torque. Extremely minimal difference.
Is it maybe tied with the use of E85? Mine is a flex as well, but I only use plain old 87 octane.
Yes, E85 yields approximately 3-3.5 MPG less than standard 91 octane.
 

R3cord303

Posse In Effect
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Posts
1,166
Reaction score
1,421
Location
Oregon Valley
Compared my '04 to an '09 equivalent. The nnbs is only 300 lbs heavier, 15 more HP, and 5 more torque. Extremely minimal difference.
Is it maybe tied with the use of E85? Mine is a flex as well, but I only use plain old 87 octane.

Yes, E85 yields approximately 3-3.5 MPG less than standard 91 octane.

Is the 14.3 mpg average part of the EPA quoted rating or user supplied real world testing? Because I don’t think the EPA rating would use E85
 

Thauber

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
48
Reaction score
35
Location
Columbus, GA
Is the 14.3 mpg average part of the EPA quoted rating or user supplied real world testing? Because I don’t think the EPA rating would use E85
I can't speak for where Swathdriver got his numbers, but I'm guessing experience and research. The link below does show EPA for an '09 on straight E85. Interesting to see his custom mixtures fall in line with those estimates for E85. Awesome he took time to make the spreadsheets.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2009_GMC_Yukon.shtml
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,803
Posts
1,874,460
Members
97,647
Latest member
jkiger95
Top