6.2

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
37
Reaction score
40
Location
Loganville, GA
Your gonna need the PCM, wiring harness, and all the supporting gear due to the Displacement on Demand and Variable Valve Timing. Then integrating that into the 2001 body, not to mention what transmission are you running. Then you have fuel delivery issues, as the 6.2 was a returnless system, where the 2001 has a return style fuel system.....and the list keeps going......

Basically it would be a lot of work to integrate into the older platform. You would be way ahead looking for a LQ4 6.0......
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
44,951
Location
Li'l Weezyana
You can do a LPE harness to make the 58t reluctor work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did they ever get that adapter thing working better? Regardless, I still wouldn't recommend a 6.2 over a 6.0 because of all the differences unless you already have the 6.2 and don't mind a challenge. You can swap the cam and do other small things to a Gen3 LQ4 or LQ9 and have more power than a 6.2 and it would be a direct swap.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,767
Posts
1,873,948
Members
97,607
Latest member
irochj
Top