Bad mpg?

[blanchard7684]

And do you wonder why I referred to you as "clueless guy"???

I'll give you a hint, its because you were being, and still are being, a clueless internet troll.

And it amuses me to prove such clueless internet trolls wrong.


For those that are offended I offer;



And for those that would go on to say that I'm just a mean person for not caring one little bit if someone is offended, I offer:



...

Didn't say I was offended.

Hint: Lions aren't concerned with opinions of sheep.

 

[Antonm]

I get it man.

Despite 100 years of engine design and research at OEM and university, it all comes down to a conclusion from Boyle's law: reduce displacement to increase pressure at bottom dead center, which increases power.

Good stuff.

I can't get enough. keep typing.

Please do quote where I said anything even remotely close to that stupid statement you just made. Because you're just talking out of your ass and trying to redirect again.

And if you figured out that Boyles law is in fact wrong,,,then you'd be a shoe-in for a noble prize, but somehow I don't think that's the case,,,I think you're just a dumb internet troll.
...

 

[Antonm]

Didn't say I was offended.

Hint: Lions aren't concerned with opinions of sheep.

Apparently the English language also alludes you.

What did I say in that post , lets scroll back up and see,,,

I said " For those that are offended I offer;"

This is an open forum, and we are not the only two readers, hence the wording "For those that are" and not "to clueless guy internet troll".

So now you've demonstrated that not only do you not understand basic of math/ can't understand the equations that you posted, you also struggle with reading comprehension.

You know, your struggle with reading comprehension might explain a lot actually. They have therapies to help with reading comprehension, maybe look into one.
....

 

[blanchard7684]

Please do quote where I said anything even remotely close to that stupid statement you just made. Because you're just talking out of you ass and trying to redirect again.

And if you figured out that Boyles law is in fact wrong,,,then you'd be a shoe-in for a noble prize, but somehow I don't think that's the case,,,I think you're just a dumb internet troll.
...

No need to get mad.

I've learned well from your take on Boyle's law that reduced displacement increases pressure at bottom dead center.

The irrefutable conclusion is that power increases.

You should be proud, man!

Golf clap.

 

[Antonm]

No need to get mad.

I've learned well from your take on Boyle's law that reduced displacement increases pressure at bottom dead center.

The irrefutable conclusion is that power increases.

You should be proud, man!

Golf clap.

Pretty I've asked you (like a few times) to quote where I've said anything even remotely close to that.

But you haven't, probably because you know it'd just re-enforce how dumb you are by showing the statements were you think it says this, but clearly don't.

And mad,,,what are you talking about? I'm laughing my ass off at you with every post, if I wasn't entertained, I wouldn't keep coming back. This is making the work day go by a lot quicker, so thanks for that at least.
...

 

[Antonm]

Hint: Lions aren't concerned with opinions of sheep.

lol , this is the Lion that everyone that calls themselves a lion really is. Just like people that call themselves alpha or whatever other dumb shit they think makes them seem impressive to others. If you gotta tell people that you're something, then you aren't whatever that is.


...

 

[blanchard7684]

lol , this is the Lion that everyone that calls themselves a lion really is. Just like people that call themselves alpha or whatever other dumb shit they think makes them seem impressive to others. If you gotta tell people that you're something, then you aren't whatever that is.

View attachment 447974
...

Coming from the guy who thinks Boyles law proves lower displacement increases power.

There is actually no better description for you than "beta".

Again...I can't thank you enough for the amusement.

I'll hit you up when I've built my minimal displacement super machine so you can see the results.

 

[blanchard7684]

Pretty I've asked you (like a few times) to quote where I've said anything even remotely close to that.

But you haven't, probably because you know it'd just re-enforce how dumb you are by showing the statements were you think it says this, but clearly don't.

And mad,,,what are you talking about? I'm laughing my ass off at you with every post, if I wasn't entertained, I wouldn't keep coming back. This is making the work day go by a lot quicker, so thanks for that at least.
...

You've made your point very clear.

I understand it perfectly: lower displacement will increase power, because Boyle's law says so.

It is P1V1 = P2V2.

Got it.

Nobel stuff.

 

[Antonm]

Coming from the guy who thinks Boyles law proves lower displacement increases power.

There is actually no better description for you than "beta".

Again...I can't thank you enough for the amusement.

I'll hit you up when I've built my minimal displacement super machine so you can see the results.

What does this make, the fifth time, I challenged you to quote where I've said anything even remotely similar to that statement, yet you can't

So I'll say it again (maybe repetition will help with you reading comprehension issue), I challenge you to quote where I have said anything like that. Please do, so that I can so you yet again how misguided (misguided in a nice word for dumb BTW) you are.
...

 

[Antonm]

You've made your point very clear.

I understand it perfectly: lower displacement will increase power, because Boyle's law says so.

What does this make, the fifth time, I challenged you to quote where I've said anything even remotely similar to that statement, yet you can't.It is P1V1 = P2V2.

Got it.

Nobel stuff.

you've got a case of the stupid is what you've got (and a bad case at that).

I've lost count now, but I again challenge you AGAIN to quote where I've said anything like these ridiculous things you keep saying.

And yes, Boyle saw is in fact a scientific law (and it freaking hilarious that you're arguing against it BTW).

You know what's even more funny,,,I haven't even used p1*V1=P2*v2 (which is a 100% true equation BTW) to prove you wrong,,, the only equations I've used are the ones YOU posted.

So now are you now saying that not only is Boyle's law is wrong, but so are the equations that YOU posted (you know the only equations I've used to show you how wrong you are,,,those equations)?
...