Bang for your Buck; Escky, Denali, or LTZ

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

IanSLT

TYF Newbie
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14
Reaction score
0
Location
Calgary, Alberta Canada
Now that some of you have had some seat time in your wonderful rides and maybe some time to refect a little on your purchase, if one was to ask you if you would buy the same truck again...would you or would you alter your purchase ?. Lets use the production year(s) as 2008/2009 for this thread as I'm keen to know if say an Escalade is a better choice in the long run than a loaded Denali or even say a LTZ with a 6.2 motor.

Cheers Ian
 

zach2011

Platinum Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Posts
1,640
Reaction score
4
I would go with a Denali, it is very similar to the Escalade for a lot less, but the Escalade does have its perks like bigger nav screen, HID's with auto high beams, etc. Both have softer leather than the LTZ though.

Also, I would stick with year model 2008 to keep the heated windshield fluid system and rainsense wipers, although I think the wipers were deleted in 2010 and not 2009 models.
 

R.Beezy

Costco Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Posts
334
Reaction score
5
Location
Bay Area 510
i think its all personal preference and how much money you're willing to spend. u gota remember, all 3 trucks (yukon, tahoe, escalade) are all pretty much the same thing.. all built on the same gm chassis. but if i had the money to get an escalade, id get an escalade just cuz i like the way it looks especially with the factory 22's that most of them come with. much more luxurious than a tahoe or yukon, cuz its a caddy
 

SabrToothSqrl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
I wanted a used esky over a new tahoe, but the insurance was $300/month vs $110/month for a tahoe... I do wish i had the 6.2L though... also the 09+ tahoe has the 6 speed auto + brake controller + blue tooth.
 

williajj

Full Access Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
106
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesota
I debated this for a long time before I bought my Denali and I am very happy with my decision. I considered all 3, but what it really came down to was the 6.2L and at the time the 6-speed tranny. I saved $10K by not going with an Esky and IMO the Denali looks every bit as good as an Esky... if not better. You can get dealer installed GM 22's now on any NNBS.

Keep in mind that the Tahoe is 4WD vs. AWD in the Esky and Denali.
 

SLTexas

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Posts
43
Reaction score
1
Location
San Antonio, TX
It's all personal preference. If I could've afforded it I would have gone with an Escalade. I was even looking at used Escalades. I wanted a Denali, but still a little too expensive for me. So I went with an 07 Yukon SLT fully loaded with every option except 4WD and rear DVD. Added a Denali grill and it looks just as good with all the luxury features. You can t go wrong with either choice. LTZ or Denali or if you can Escalade.
 

InTruckDesign

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Posts
832
Reaction score
26
Location
SW CT,
I would go with a Tahoe or Yukon just for the fact that it gives you the ability to lock the transfer case in 4hi and 4lo..the Esky and Denali do not allow that option.
 

stevek

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Posts
1,241
Reaction score
2
Location
Dallas, TX
I would go with a Tahoe or Yukon just for the fact that it gives you the ability to lock the transfer case in 4hi and 4lo..the Esky and Denali do not allow that option.

99% of people don't even need 4lo - it's a marketing scam. Same with AWD.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,039
Posts
1,861,389
Members
96,488
Latest member
dabsnabbs
Top