I'd suggest finding a better word, I'm sure you didn't mean to call anyone stupid but perhaps just that the advice 'doesn't make sense'. Not sure about the rest of the world, but that word is generally avoided in the US unless absolutely necessary (generally not in civil dialogues) ...
@jfoj aligned with all your remarks on CAFE/OPEC stuff. Its somewhat ridiculous how 'better emissions' oftentimes means we burn more fuel as well (as we know the 70s/80s smog era engines became less fuel efficient actually but at least they didn't pollute as badly!). These DFM type enhancements seriously don't add value to the consumer.... hope GM hires a true pragmatist to head up the technology group and clear up this mess... Ford is probably having a field day now as they were the only ones dropping engines from wet oil pump belts, non-keyed crank sprockets!!
PS: 6.6L doesn't require premium fuel
per the manual
And I'll out my frustration as well. I didn't know about DFM until after we bought our 24' suburban (guess I should have been a member here !!). I had assumed it just had the 4 cyl vs 8 cyl mode stuff that is annoying but is a “known devil”. Had I known about DFM, I think we would have figured out an alternate plan (to be honest I don't know what else it would have been. Ford has been doing some ridiculous things as well) and there way no way my wife was going to drive a 3/4 or 1 ton pickup or a mini-van.