- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Posts
- 8,744
- Reaction score
- 608
Decided in escalade. Will be doing the new whipple 2.9 on it also.
Thank you to all for your input
Thank you to all for your input
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
So you would buy a escalade because you care what people think? Just because it has a escalade badge and you want people to me impressed? Wow am I the only one who would buy a vehicle because I like it and not someone else. OP go drive both vehicles and look at them side by side... Pick which one YOU LIKE
So you would buy a escalade because you care what people think? Just because it has a escalade badge and you want people to me impressed? Wow am I the only one who would buy a vehicle because I like it and not someone else. OP go drive both vehicles and look at them side by side... Pick which one YOU LIKE
I have retractable side steps on my escalade now just gives cleaner look
I think there are a couple ways to look at this though. I for one love the amenities and performance of the Denali but do not want the attention bling of the Escalade.for 11k more its no brainer. i'd definitely go with the escalade.
the brand image and the design is so much more classy than whatever else you'd be getting
you'd be a paying $200 more a month maybe but than again you wont look back in time and wonder "should i have gotten the escalade"
my previous vehicle was a 2008 short version escalade.and new one i got is a 2016 suburban LT.
negotiated price was $54k. i wanted to be as far as possible from an escalade in price (in this case about 20k ish from my ideal setup). by doing so i now dont regret not getting an escalade because i'd have to pay a hefty difference.
im in livery business and believe me , in the food chain of GM SUV line up if an suv is not an escalade it just simply is not. a suburban does the job equally well in my case and it being an ltz model or a gmc denali wont matter to the client. but if it is an escalade they know and totally loving it , are they willing to pay more for it ? NO. hence the Basic suburban LT with basic features. You cant just fully load a suburban ltz and make it a $73k vehicle and try to tell ppl that. it is still a suburban in their eyes, they hardly know the difference. Same goes for the Denali, clients wont be impressed because its a denali.
and for ppl who say an escalade is just a suburban rebranded. its way more than that.i mean if i agree to pay $54k for an LT suburban with not may features , the escalade with its brand image, impressive design and options list is well worth the money they are asking for it. In my case i just did not need any of the options the Escalade had to offer because i wasn't buying it for personal use.
Had i been in OPs situation, i would definitely go with the escalade and not look back.Its just so much more impressive than whatever else is out there. Basically for the suv world it is the "King of Kings" , period.
I think there are a couple ways to look at this though. I for one love the amenities and performance of the Denali but do not want the attention bling of the Escalade.
Now certainly a lot depends on where you live and who you run with. But we do day trips to ballgames in Baltimore, four wheeling trips in WV, tow the boat down to the river to do some tubing with the kids.
I am also an owner of a mom and pop store locally owned for 67 years.
Do I want any added flash in any of those instances? NO. I like how the Denali is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Everyone knows of the Suburban and everyone knows what an Escalade is.
A Denali is more than one without being too much of the other.