No. GM LS VVT makes MORE low-RpM torque by retarding the camat lower RpMs & smaller throttle openings.
The "parked" or standard position for VVT engines is full advance.
Beyond a certain RpM, over a certain TPS%, VVT basically relaxes as RpMs climb.
In other words, the way normal people drive, it is usually in effect, improving MpGs & low-RpM torque.
I repectfully disagree.. and maybe there's something I don't know... But the VVT tables
from GM are set up ONLY to retard cam timing... Not able to advance.
That's why they use a tiny cam and then add it some cam retard up at the
top rpm to make it "act" like a larger cam...
Retarding a cam at LOW Rpm would make it "act" like a much larger cam ---
Exactly what you Don't want in low rpm/torque demand situations.
It retards the cam timing in the low/mid rpms to reduce intake manifold vacuum
and therefore less reversion increasing MPG and light throttle cruising speeds.
And then a little cam retard up near the top rpm to get the little cam to "act" like
a bigger one for the high rpm power increase..
It's like getting a small cam and medium cam all in one !!!!