tooleyondeck
Full Access Member
yo this thread is WILD lol
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
'25 Escalade is gas only according to reports.I hadn't heard about Cadillac dropping the Duramax, did they specify what year? I was looking at switching from the Suburban to the Escalade in the next two to three years.
Because this one will travel 25k miles a year, like the 185K on the Current Denali.$20 a fill mean that much to you in this day and age with a $80K car? You know that a $20 is the new $5 bill right?
Is the extra 65 horsepower worth it to you?
So with 5 cars taking high octane gas how is one going to make a difference? At that, you ought to put in a 300+ gallon tank and buy in bulk!
I just asked a simple question. Others have made it an endless debate. Not a moral high ground. I expect to put 185K on my next one and an addition $20-22 a fill-up adds up. Doesn't really matter how much I pay for the new truck, that wasn't the question.THIS.
I still don’t get how people have $80k to drop on a truck then want to have an endless internet debate about whether the extra $1/gal in a truck that does 16mpg is some sort of moral high ground.
I’m starting to think the venn diagram of people that finance these for 8 years and the ones putting 87 in them is a pretty heavy overlap.
the slight knocks prior to timing being pulled are not enough to damage the engine; that's what happens, all the time all day long
if you were correct, every 6.2 running 87 would be dead on the side of the road; but that isn't the case
not sure what your odb challenge is supposed to prove; I'm not claiming knocks don't occur, I'm claiming they are not enough to cause discernable damage
All the more reason to feed it properly with high octane fuel if you intend to go the distance with it.Because this one will travel 25k miles a year, like the 185K on the Current Denali.
I think for your application, get the 3.0 Duramax and don’t look back.Because this one will travel 25k miles a year, like the 185K on the Current Denali.
You asked a great question and that’s why you got so many responses!I just asked a simple question. Others have made it an endless debate. Not a moral high ground. I expect to put 185K on my next one and an addition $20-22 a fill-up adds up. Doesn't really matter how much I pay for the new truck, that wasn't the question.
I am somewhat hesitant to contribute here for fear of maybe not knowing what I am really talking about. I just purchased new a 2024 Tahoe 'High Country'. My ignorance is going to say I'm not sure what 'gas' engine I have but I will assume it's not the 6.2 being debated here? But I am going to say that I have been pleasantly surprised with the mpg's I got on a 450mile round trip I just took. On the way 'there' I averaged 24+mpg. On the way back I averaged 23+mpg. Admittedly I was only going 66mph on the highway. This is what the onboard 'computer' indicated. I think the window sticker indicated that this vehicle listed the mpg's at 14 to 18? So I am greatly happy and surprised or........the computer is not telling me the truth????
Why do people say stuff like this?You can use 87 octane with no issues. I’ve had 4 Denali’s with 6.2 engines and have had zero issues.