Future 2020/21 Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,582
Reaction score
26,270
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
I assure you I’m not lobbying for minivans LOL. I’m simply saying that for the size, the Tahoe interior is underwhelming from a cargo and legroom standpoint. Much of that has to do with the rear suspension set up.

It was a compromise design so they would fit in people's garages I guess. I never understood the appeal of the short wheelbase Tahoe save for the aforementioned reason, but then again I'm used to the 2-Door Jimmy and regular length Suburban.
 

cardude2000

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
2,931
Reaction score
1,037
It was a compromise design so they would fit in people's garages I guess. I never understood the appeal of the short wheelbase Tahoe save for the aforementioned reason, but then again I'm used to the 2-Door Jimmy and regular length Suburban.

It’s aesthetics too. I can’t stand the look of the suburban but there are those who can’t stand the look of the SWB. So I think it satisfies both. Livery almost always buy LWB and that’s a huge market for GM (and why I always think ‘Uber!’ When I see a black LWB.

unfortunately unless the next gen brings
Materially more cargo room to the SWB I’ll be forced to settle for the looks of a
LWB vehicle
 

PG01

Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Posts
14,899
Reaction score
18,299
Location
Up here to the right
It’s aesthetics too. I can’t stand the look of the suburban but there are those who can’t stand the look of the SWB. So I think it satisfies both. Livery almost always buy LWB and that’s a huge market for GM (and why I always think ‘Uber!’ When I see a black LWB.

unfortunately unless the next gen brings
Materially more cargo room to the SWB I’ll be forced to settle for the looks of a
LWB vehicle
X2 in the current gen, last gen looked good in a lwb and swb, currently the lwb look off somehow somewhere the lines look off... almost like the rear wheels need to move back some.
 

Csurp

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Posts
69
Reaction score
34
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL
It was a compromise design so they would fit in people's garages I guess. I never understood the appeal of the short wheelbase Tahoe save for the aforementioned reason, but then again I'm used to the 2-Door Jimmy and regular length Suburban.

Nice thing about choice is that you can get what you like or need.

I bought the Tahoe because I don't need a lot of room. I keep the third row folded down and have enough storage for my needs.

I also do a lot of city driving and parking so didn't want to deal with the extra length.

YMMV

It's all good.
 
OP
OP
GTNator

GTNator

Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Posts
1,289
Reaction score
864
It’s aesthetics too. I can’t stand the look of the suburban but there are those who can’t stand the look of the SWB. So I think it satisfies both. Livery almost always buy LWB and that’s a huge market for GM (and why I always think ‘Uber!’ When I see a black LWB.

unfortunately unless the next gen brings
Materially more cargo room to the SWB I’ll be forced to settle for the looks of a
LWB vehicle

I LOVE the LWB. I drive one solo every day in and out of Washington DC, parking garages, and traffic. It’s just so capable from a space perspective, everything always fits, all the time, comfortably, people and things. Trip to Home Depot, no problem, trip to Costco, no problem, going out with friends, no problem. From a functional perspective, you can’t beat the LWB. Even on this forum, you rarely see folks with the LWB wishing they had a shorty, unless a life event occurs like kids leave home or whatever. It’s always the other way around, people who were considering either Long or Short (as opposed to folks who never considered the L vs. S. and instead knew what they wanted out of the gate) and somehow ended up with Short, wish they had gotten the Long. That’s why I say if you’re considering both, get the long. If you’re not considering both, get the one that appeals to you.

And as far as esthetics, it’s all relative and changes with perspective. I personally used to like the SWB more, but then once I got into the LWB and appreciated its extra space, LWBs look better to me. In fact the SWB looks like someone squashed the back in or something. But in the end I love them both and they’re both great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

cardude2000

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
2,931
Reaction score
1,037
I LOVE the LWB. I drive one solo every day in and out of Washington DC, parking garages, and traffic. It’s just so capable from a space perspective, everything always fits, all the time, comfortably, people and things. Trip to Home Depot, no problem, trip to Costco, no problem, going out with friends, no problem. From a functional perspective, you can’t beat the LWB. Even on this forum, you rarely see folks with the LWB wishing they had a shorty, unless a life event occurs like kids leave home or whatever. It’s always the other way around, people who were considering either Long or Short (as opposed to folks who never considered the L vs. S. and instead knew what they wanted out of the gate) and somehow ended up with Short, wish they had gotten the Long. That’s why I say if you’re considering both, get the long. If you’re not considering both, get the one that appeals to you.

And as far as esthetics, it’s all relative and changes with perspective. I personally used to like the SWB more, but then once I got into the LWB and appreciated its extra space, LWBs look better to me. In fact the SWB looks like someone squashed the back in or something. But in the end I love them both and they’re both great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree. I’ll have to settle for the looks of the LWB unless the next gen can materially increase interior space.

Here’s to wishing!!
 

AZCreeker

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Posts
382
Reaction score
252
the cargo space of the SWB is ridiculous. I understand if you turn it to a 5 seater it gets bigger but a freakin traverse has more room than a taheo behind the third row.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,582
Reaction score
26,270
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
the cargo space of the SWB is ridiculous. I understand if you turn it to a 5 seater it gets bigger but a freakin traverse has more room than a taheo behind the third row.

True, but there's more to it than that. That Tahoe can pull over 4 tons behind it and go places that would wreck the Traverse.
 

cardude2000

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
2,931
Reaction score
1,037
the cargo space of the SWB is ridiculous. I understand if you turn it to a 5 seater it gets bigger but a freakin traverse has more room than a taheo behind the third row.

Cargo in both sizes is pathetic for their exterior dimensions. Minivans have more room.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,321
Posts
1,865,959
Members
96,914
Latest member
Tony228
Top