In need of a new SUV

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Miami-Dade

Staff member
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Posts
3,856
Reaction score
4,822
I would NOT recommend a new Tahoe to ANYONE.
Be safe out there.
Bob

I would recommend a Tahoe/Suburban to EVERYONE..When I first got my Tahoe everyone was shocked when they saw my interior..They said they had no idea how awesome it was..Everyone that rides in my Tahoe never wants to get out once I get to the destination as they are so comfy.

Whenever I get fuel and see another 15 plus Tahoe next to me on the other side of the pump I always ask them how they like it and if they have any complaints..So far all I get are happy campers.

To me they are the perfect long distance vehicles which is what MOST people [like myself and most here] buy them for.

On my trip to Key West last week I saw so many 2015 plus Tahoe,Suburban and Yukon on US 1 that I lost track how many I saw..I hardly saw any Sequoia,Expedition or Navigator.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
H

hunter991

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Posts
56
Reaction score
34
so it almost sounds like "don't do it" unless you trade up everytime the warranty period expires.
 

WillCO

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Posts
465
Reaction score
322
Location
Castle Rock, Colorado
so it almost sounds like "don't do it" unless you trade up everytime the warranty period expires.
Not really. If you ask on an internet forum like this, the answers you get will probably overrepresent the problems, because people with problems post more to internet forums than happy customers do. If, like the guy above said, you ask a random person driving a Tahoe how they like it, I think you get a consistently positive response. Or, do as I did and ask a couple of mechanics. They aren't seeing many 2015+ Tahoes until they are out of warranty, but the powertrains are fundamentally the same and they can tell you their opinion of Tahoes over time.

You do see a lot of old Tahoes on the road, too. So there's that. When they do break they are not expensive to fix.
 
OP
OP
H

hunter991

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Posts
56
Reaction score
34
K thanks.. i have been asking people who own them but what i am finding is they bought it because its a GM and except the issues or they don't know why other than it looked cool. I asked on the forum because people here more than likely know the ins and outs and are way more in tune to the longevity and quality of the vehicle. But your right, i am soliciting opinions everywhere. I am known to research the hell out of purchases like this.
 

adventurenali92

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Posts
7,390
Reaction score
8,619
Location
Big Bear Lake, ca
@hunter991 , it's good to research a lot when you are making a big purchase like this. This is an investment and you want to make sure you're getting all the right info. I did the exact same thing 2 years when I bought my 2006 Denali xl. I had my heart set on a 2007 sequoia limited. But I couldnt find a limited with 4WD and that's a must have for me since I live in a ski town. My options were 2WD limited with the interior options I wanted or 4WD SR5 models that didn't have the interior I wanted. When I was told to look into GM, this forum had such a wealth of knowledge and settled my decision to buy a Denali.
 

05alive

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Posts
413
Reaction score
314
Location
Masshole
Interior is a personal issue. Some people love it, some people hate it. I personally have another comparable vehicle or two that I prefer the interior on, but I also know people who would trade for the k2 interior.

Reliability is another issue. Modern GM trucks (and SUV's, they are built on the same platform more or less) are not well built. Many people with experience with the brand will tell you to get a late model NBS (00-06/7) with low miles. The NNBS (2007-2013) vehicles had issues related to the engines and the interiors. The newest (k2xx) trucks are just poorly built. Things like trim break off, panels are poorly aligned, and lots of electronics fail, repeatedly. The quality control in general is poor. My father's yukon denali has a bolt sticking up through the carpet where you step to get into the third row, and another is about to come through. The antennas had water intrusion issues. the displays have issues. Intellilink/mylink isn't that great of a system imo. The 8 speed transmissions have major issues. The seats on the k2 trucks are much narrower than the older ones.

However manufactures sort out issues normally. Later NNBS vehicles were a significant improvement over early ones. Hopefully in a year or two the k2 vehicles are better built, because they are at heart a great vehicle. It's a blast to drive. The suspension is great, the engine has awesome power, it pulls a trailer like nothing's there. It's fast, stylish, gets great mileage and range, and it draws attention. It's got a million cupholders and pockets in the front. Passengers would rather take the k2 over the nbs or the pickup normally.

It depends on your situation. There's a trade off with everything. It will not be the cheapest or easiest vehicle you can own but keep in mind it's a massive hunk of metal with a giant engine, seating capacity, and towing capacity that is rivaled by few passenger vehicles. And despite that, it's relatively comfortable, manageable, and more than holds it's own in almost every category, against every vehicle. It's part deville, part corvette, part gmc truck, and more.
 

05alive

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Posts
413
Reaction score
314
Location
Masshole
To me this is just unacceptable when spending 60k.

Pardon me but you'd shit yourself in a rover then, or really any vehicle with an MSRP over 50 grand. Almost any "luxury" vehicle has lots of problems and huge repairs bills. There's a reason no one dd's a Rolls Royce.
The older Rovers had insane reliability issues, parts are astronomical, and systems were complicated. But when everything was working, it was a like a dream. So smooth, planted, and comfortable. And to top it off the rovers just had a solidness to them. The door has a distinctive secure thud, and everything just was so well thought out. The newer ones are lighter and more money was spent on reliability, so it lost it's former charm and turned some former owners away. I worked for a guy who owned them for years, and dumped the brand new one as soon as he got it because it had lost it's roverness. He didn't care if things broke, it was an autobiography, if he could afford one he could afford 3 to rotate lol. He wanted the classic range rover luxury. My uncle owned a brand new A8L. Always in the shop. But it was a like a bullet train on the highway. Infiniti, same way. Lot of down time, expensive parts.

You could do a lot worse on an unreliable vehicle, and pay much more, and have much higher repair bills. You could also get a toyota, but it's not the same beast as a Tahoe, doesn't pull as much, and burns more dinos.

My point is this: You can complain all day about reliability, and maybe if you get a particularly bad one it isn't the vehicle for you. If you can stomach/overlook some issues, the K2 suv's are the best around. Maybe a tahoe isn't for you but this is TahoeYukonForum, and not "SUV forum."


Ultimately your choice will based on your own biases and budget
. Asking a body of people with a mass of experience in a narrow selection of vehicles is not the way to find your next vehicle. Ask in person what people think of their vehicles, test drive them, borrow them from your friends.
Truly honest advice about any vehicle will send you running for the hills. Everything has a fatal flaw, or there would be a total of one vehicle for sale.
 

Burby

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Posts
113
Reaction score
61
I traded a very clean Toyo 4runner that I had maintained to over 105K mostly trouble free miles. I am sad that I never drove it the zilloin miles I could have. But it was too small for my frame, my family size and did not tow well. I was looking at used Sequoias and they had great options but feel like a big truck, squat when towing, have lousy gas mileage and look long in the tooth. For me it was a splurge and a nervous one to jump into a new 2016 GM Suburban from a Toyo option. But I have history putting 70K on two Equinox fleet cars for work and those had zero issues for the duration I drove them. I've had the Burban for a year and it has been awesome with no issues (14K miles). Road trips are a dream. It looks gorgeous. Fits all our gear. If and when I tow I am not limited. I can't speak to the snow 4X4 handling because we didn't get much this year. You sound like you are looking for a purpose built vehicle. Of the two I wouldn't hesitate to jump into one of GM's over the old looking Sequoias with their horrible gas milage.

Also, if you have boats and toys I'd go for the suburban for the extra storage and longer wheelbase.
 

sillyyankee

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Posts
12
Reaction score
4
Location
cape cod massachusetts
I have a love / hate relationship with my Denali Yukon XL. Every time I get frustrated that something is wrong I remember that I drive the best people and crap mover on the road. I almost always love driving it, and I can even tow the family 4 place enclosed snowmobile trailer without breaking a sweat, take ALL the gear and bring 8 people.
For me, it's a no brainer. Plus it's like driving your couch.
I looked at the Sequoia when I purchased this 2013. The Toyota was 5-10K more with worse gas mileage and less cargo and passenger area.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
132,377
Posts
1,867,018
Members
97,013
Latest member
Alohaames

Latest posts

Top