WillCO
Full Access Member
That is a 4Runner. I did the Google "Reverse Image Search" to be sure. You can do it easily with a right-click on the image.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
That is a 4Runner. I did the Google "Reverse Image Search" to be sure. You can do it easily with a right-click on the image.
The vehicle was a non-starter for me because I didn't want to stare at all that hard, gray plastic whenever I drove it..
I'm in the same boat as some of the others. I currently drive a 2012 4Runner Limited and it drives just like the day I bought it. There is no denying the 4Runner's legendary reliability. I find on this forum the reasons for purchase are more ideological whereas on the t4r.org forums the rationales are data driven.
Either way.... we rented a 2016 Yukon SLT in Florida for 2 weeks in March. It had the stock wheels but my family and I really enjoyed driving this vehicle especially with a car seat, stroller, and 14 year old. The interior was super nice. I did notice the car seat didn't fit very well behind the front seats but it was awesome in the middle. Adults could sit in the 2nd row on each side of the car seat with no issues.
The 3rd row is basically more useless than the 3rd row in the 4Runner. The interior specs in the Sequoia are better than the Yukon but, as mentioned, it is a dated design and not so exciting interior. For those reasons, getting an XL or Suburban is probably the better bet but the SLT midpoint trim is nicer than the LT (no fog lights on models under LTZ???).
Anyway just thought I would post my feedback on the rental. It only had a few miles on it when we picked it up and we put hundreds on it. The fuel economy was pretty good and as good or better than the 4Runner. Mind you the SLT was 2wd with no 4wd and the 4Runner is full-time. Awesome ride and giving serious consideration to picking on up this year.
View attachment 80639
View attachment 80640
View attachment 80641
View attachment 80642
I don't think it had a hitch so I will assume it didn't have the tow package and therefore had 3.08 gears. I've read that 3.42 make a huge difference.Nice review and write up..........
Interesting observation you made about the car seat behind the front seats....my daughter is in a car seat and my current truck (2500) has ample room for her to sit behind the driver, but would certainly have even more space in the middle. I think I must be one of the few who prefer the bench seat in the second row. It is extremely rare here that you find an LT on a dealer lot with the bench seat, so there's a chance I may have to go with an LS and have leather installed at purchase. You're correct about the 3rd row being useless in the Tahoe/Yukon if you are bringing any cargo along though. I'd actually prefer the XL/suburban just for the added cargo space and useable 3rd row, but garage limitations at my house have basically all but pointed me towards the shorter wheelbase. By the way, do you have any idea if the Yukon you rented had a 3.08 or 3.42 rear end?
I don't know much about the 4Runner and Sequoia, although I'm familiar with the reliability factor of Toyota SUV's. I'd agree that their interiors are too bland for my taste. I'm coming out of years of driving 1500/2500 4wd pickups as a daily and going to an SUV later this year. I've gotten to the point where being able to garage my vehicle, get kids/gear in and out easier and have the ability to store cargo out of the weather are more important than ever, more important than the infrequent hauling of anything that won't fit in a Tahoe.
Yeah- I had the rear-facing infant seat behind the driver seat and it was way too tight and cramped for me as I needed to have the driver seat all the way back. Once we got all of our luggages, stroller, and golf clubs out, I moved the car seat to the middle and had no issues.I have the two captains chairs in my Tahoe for the second row and each seat has a car seat in it and I find no issues with the fit along with having ample room up front for myself and any passengers. One car seat is forward facing while the other is still rear facing.
I don't think it had a hitch so I will assume it didn't have the tow package and therefore had 3.08 gears. I've read that 3.42 make a huge difference.
I agree with you on everything. Garage is super important for me too and the XL/Suburban's 19 feet of length would take up almost all of my 21' x 21' double garage. I would have to get rid of storage racks or mount shelving high up (fortunately the design of my house means I have a very tall garage so this could actually work). Door placements, garage sinks, and garage stairs will all make for a tight fit.
As for the car seat- you're probably right. I should have clarified that this was for an infant rear-facing seat. When we left FLL airport, I was pretty crammed in the driver seat because we had the 2nd row seat down on the passenger side. I was actually surprised at how tight it was. But, again, the middle it was amazing. I could have the driver seat all the way back with no issues and passengers could sit on both sides of the car seat. I understand the XL has slightly better 2nd row leg room too.
I live in Nova Scotia so sales tax is 15% and my purchase price is higher (sticker is $70k+ on an SLT) but you can get 2016 SLT Yukon/XL with dealers asking under $60k with less than 15-25,000 miles so this is probably the route I will go. I expect a purchase price under $55k pre-tax and hopefully closer to $50k. My trade on the 4Runner is worth about $30k but I might even try to sell in in the North East because the Canadian dollar is such crap right now.
Yeah- I had the rear-facing infant seat behind the driver seat and it was way too tight and cramped for me as I needed to have the driver seat all the way back. Once we got all of our luggages, stroller, and golf clubs out, I moved the car seat to the middle and had no issues.