Looking to buy a Tahoe. Which is the better scenario?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

techbiker

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Posts
114
Reaction score
86
Hey Tech, Ya we have PPV's here as well, most with high mileage though, still going for 10k-ish. I just feel like they all have been beaten and abused. I don't know the cost to reupholster the entire interior and putting in a new center console, etc, but it seems like a lot of work and would come out close to the same as a normal Tahoe for sale.

I would consider it, getting a 13' or 14' with 50k, we just don't have deals like that in CA. (for example this 09' or this 10') I thought about buying out of state to save on taxes, but it would be quite the risk to fly to Texas to look at a PPV.

Have you looked at buying directly at a local county or city auction? Once I registered at Rene Bates auctioneers, I was able to place a bid for my late 2011. In the end I paid $7500 for a Tahoe with 70,800 miles. I also got all of the maintenance records from the County. I am spending $2000 to replace all of the bad interior parts. Some unnecessary spending and mechanical maintenance (new struts, etc.) and I'm at ~$12k total. So far (knocks on wood), our Tahoe is a real gem.

Dealers all have to make their profit. If you buy directly from a government, you can pocket the difference. Buying direct does increase your risk IMO. I drove 200 miles each way to inspect their vehicles and I was only given 30 minutes to do so. You will also be doing more deferred maintenance yourself, but at least you know the work is done correctly.

TLDR: What is your time worth?

P.S. You can usually snag great parts deals on Craigslist or OfferUp if you are diligent. I found a good 2nd row bench and rear door cards for $150.
 
Last edited:

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,611
Reaction score
26,327
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Excellent advice guys, thanks. This makes me less worried about buying a 100k+ Tahoe and using any extra money for these issues that have been discussed. It also sounds like I'd be fine with either the 4 or 6-speed, so I will not rule out 08's.

Doing a "background check" on the VIN of whatever truck I'm looking to buy seems most important still in trying to determine if it was well maintained.

A couple other questions:

1) Should I expect to have more issues when buying a 4x4?

2) What does the LT2, LT3 tags stand for? I was looking at this 08' Tahoe which shows LT2.

You can download pdf copies of the brochures for just about every model year on a particular website, the name escapes me at the moment. Just google 2008 tahoe brochure and it'll come up. Then you can read what LT2 and such included that particular year.

With a 4WD, you can have more issues, there is more stuff to maintain and service and potentially break. That being said, I went with 4WD anyway for the peace of mind and just to have it. So that means more maintenance and in the earlier years, slightly lower fuel economy. Someday, the differentials will have to be rebuilt, the transfer case overhauled and new front u-joints or yokes, someday. Part of owning any 4x4.

Do you want to be that guy with a 2WD and highway tires getting caught in a snow storm or some washed out road in Northern Cali? Or the guy whose wife gets in that with 4WD and simply rotates the switch to 4WD and drives through whatever got in her way?
 

HACK BLOCK

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Posts
538
Reaction score
179
Location
NYC
definitely go with option #1. spend the 12k and use the extra cash to fix everything and at least u should have a solid ride for some time. if u went with option #2, in a way u would be waiting for something to happen and u gotta hope when that "something" does happen it doesn't leave you stranded somewhere with the baby
 

savagebasher

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2014
Posts
36
Reaction score
8
I bought my 07 with 113k back in Oct for $17k.. it is an LTZ and 4WD (I am in MN) and extremely clean so I did good on that price. Even had new tires! Mine had the typical issues, dash crack, door handles, dead power running boards, etc. But you would never guess it has 113k. It just rolled 118k and I had to add some oil so I just installed the Range AFM disable. I suspect I will get 75k out of it at least.. which for me is about 2-3 years :) Oh I also had do to the rear axle seals as the fluid was leaking onto brake parts causing smell and smoke.

Next, I will likely get a later model Yukon Denali.
 

Big Mama

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Posts
3,398
Reaction score
2,070
Location
Virginia
Look for the tech toys you like too. I have an 07 Denali with lots of goodys but no Bluetooth. When it comes to miles I agree that 150 is nothing if the maintenance was done. Get all the records Anyone doing it will have records. Make sure seating is what you want like 2nd row captains chairs. It all adds up.
 

Classehoe

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Posts
5
Reaction score
3
My 2 cents as someone who owns and repairs tahoes

I prefer the 3lt. Pretty close to ltz luxury with out the ridiculously expensive to repair suspension.
The iron block 5.3s seem to hold up better, mine just hit 260k miles with just the afm turned off.
The flex fuel fuel pumps seem to hold up better.
The 4l60e is much less expensive to repair than the 6l80e. The 6l80 tends to get more sloppy with age.
I typically go for clean body 1 owner new car tradeins with over 100k. Imo these owners tend to take the best care of their vehicles.
My truck is a 2007 3lt. It was fully serviced not(tires,brakes,ujoints) Ipaid 7995 2.5 years ago from a GMC dealer. I bought it with a little over 200k and it's at 260 with only minor repairs.
 

08HoeCD

Full Access Member
Joined
May 6, 2016
Posts
2,052
Reaction score
1,931
Yup
I stumbled on a 3LT (LT3) and am amazed at all the features. I've driven all makes, including Audi and Infiniti, and I'm still more impressed with the array of features in my 10-year-old Tahoe. And no fear of the LTZ suspension taking a dump.
 
OP
OP
zwanzon

zwanzon

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Posts
44
Reaction score
18
Such an incredible community here with great advice from everyone. I'm making a master list of all these comments that will truly help in my search.

A couple other questions if anyone knows:

1) Will 4x4 issues arise (like the ones mentioned) even if the 4x4 is not being used frequently? Does simply just having the 4x4 option on the truck create suspension issues down the road?
2) The Range Technology AFM Disable Device is $189 on Amazon. What does the BlackBear Performance Traditional Tune for $255 include that makes it the better choice? They don't really describe what the tune does (or at least I don't see it).
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,611
Reaction score
26,327
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Such an incredible community here with great advice from everyone. I'm making a master list of all these comments that will truly help in my search.

A couple other questions if anyone knows:

1) Will 4x4 issues arise (like the ones mentioned) even if the 4x4 is not being used frequently? Does simply just having the 4x4 option on the truck create suspension issues down the road?
2) The Range Technology AFM Disable Device is $189 on Amazon. What does the BlackBear Performance Traditional Tune for $255 include that makes it the better choice? They don't really describe what the tune does (or at least I don't see it).

You have to use the front differential and transfer case, exercise them if you will, to keep them limbered up and ready to go from time to time. The parts are there and time goes on even if they are not being used, something can go wrong, someday, maybe.

A BleackBear tune is going to make the truck more fun and efficient to drive. They will tune the truck to your tastes. It can remove a set amount of torque management and improves the programming of the transmission and a host of other things that changes for the better how the truck drives. If they can keep their foot out of it, almost everyone experiences an increase in fuel economy too.

My engine from the factory is rated at 335 ft/lbs of torque. In stock form, the most torque I could see via the Tech2 on hard acceleration was 282 ft/lbs or torque. Just yesterday I happened to remember that feature and made an energetic but not full pedal to the metal acceleration from a stop and noted 326 ft/lbs of torque. Before the tune the truck's tires would never break traction. Now it's pretty much whenever I want to; that is with AT tires, not highway treads.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
44,945
Location
Li'l Weezyana
The Range Device is good for what it is- a simple, plug-and-play way to disable AFM that can be removed if the vehicle is going in for warranty service or is sold. But all it does is disable AFM. If you can afford the extra $60-$80 and voiding a warranty is not a factor, a tune is by far the better choice. You can have AFM disabled and, as James mentioned, so many other tweaks that will vastly improve the driving experience and possibly even fuel economy.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
132,370
Posts
1,866,903
Members
96,996
Latest member
Brynedic
Top