Ya there kind of a bang-for-buck kind of thing I don't get 60k out them but for the price I get real good performance in trade, I like them because they are a "medium" rubber tire, Michelin's for comparison are a very "hard" rubber yes you get more miles but you won't get the same performance of a softer tire. It's just my preference I am not concerned with getting miles out of them I am concerned with them sticking to the road when it matters the most. The type of rubber used makes a differenceHad those on my wife's 2010 Tahoe we just sold in lieu of the Suburban we just got and while they were nice and quiet and all that, I wasn't too impressed with the wear. In 15K miles they were pretty damn worn, even with my frequent air checks, rotating them every 5-7K etc. And they didn't even come with treadlife warranty.
Was thinking about Eagle Tourings for the Sub, but since GY didn't want to give any treadlife warranty on them either, I just ordered a set of Bridgestone Dueler Alenza H/Ls from Costco. Have never bought a set of Bridgestones, so we'll see how it goes. Treadlife warranty is 80K, though.
I know treadlife warranty isn't necessarily an indication of anything, but at least I can go back to Costco and complain in case they wear out too soon.
I fit into the enthusiast category in regards to tires
Performance all-season tires come in H- and V-speed rating on many newer cars, especially those with enthusiast appeal or upgraded wheels. They tend to have better cornering grip than S- and T-speed rated all-season tires, but performance tires may not wear as long..........