W M S
TYF Newbie
I think the subject deserves a thread added to the forum.
I have used the GM diagnostic tools: TECH 1, TECH 2, TECH2WIN, and GDS2. I have very little experience with other manufacturer's scan tools. I retired from GM Powertrain controls service engineering a few years ago.
Since retiring, and not having ready access to the GM scan tools, I settled on an Autel MS908. It will do OBD II on domestic, Asian, and European vehicles.
I've used it on GM vehicles so far, and it is as capable as the TECH 2 and GDS2 in every respect, with the exception of pass through module programming. I didn't see myself needing that feature in the up-level model Autel.
While many scanners offer code reading/clearing and data display, the bi-directional feature is indispensable to verify the complaint/duplicate the conditions for failure, without disturbing connectors. As we all know, the simple act of disconnecting a harness can 'fix' the problem by changing pin fitment/alignment and/or removing minute bits of corrosion due to contact fretting.
I have used the GM diagnostic tools: TECH 1, TECH 2, TECH2WIN, and GDS2. I have very little experience with other manufacturer's scan tools. I retired from GM Powertrain controls service engineering a few years ago.
Since retiring, and not having ready access to the GM scan tools, I settled on an Autel MS908. It will do OBD II on domestic, Asian, and European vehicles.
I've used it on GM vehicles so far, and it is as capable as the TECH 2 and GDS2 in every respect, with the exception of pass through module programming. I didn't see myself needing that feature in the up-level model Autel.
While many scanners offer code reading/clearing and data display, the bi-directional feature is indispensable to verify the complaint/duplicate the conditions for failure, without disturbing connectors. As we all know, the simple act of disconnecting a harness can 'fix' the problem by changing pin fitment/alignment and/or removing minute bits of corrosion due to contact fretting.