We were actually in the same exact scenario as him and a few weeks ago bought a high country. IMHO the little differences, if you know about them, between the Denali and High Country are huge, not to mention the looks. Actually got a call from a dealer that we had ordered with today and they said they had our Dmax/max tow allocation. I went ahead and said great, send me the numbers because I wouldn’t rule out trading and so far nothing. Maybe they are hoping I’ll go down to SLT, which for the right deal I would consider.
I’ve sat in both and they are no where near that huge of a difference to me.
Frankly, my wife and I believe the new Tahoe’s have a significantly better exterior than the Yukons. If you were to put a Premier next to a SLT it’s not even close IMHO. That said, I would probably give the Denali and AT4 trims a leg up over the High Country and Z71 but those would be the exceptions.
To each their own. Think a lot of people are brand chasers and history definitely values the Yukons over the Tahoe’s, and rightfully so. But that gap closed exponentially in this last update. Pricing is much more similar as are the packages.
I think my point was that the Tahoe is much more similar to the Yukon then a new Sequoia, not focused on a comparison of Tahoe to Yukon. Toyota has done a great job at making reliable SUVs over the years, but even the new models can’t hold a candle to the luxury and overall options of the GM suvs. Again…to each their own.
Can I ask what you dislike so much about the High Country?