Engine swap

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

GMCx2

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jul 1, 2024
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
I have 2 GMC Yukons. One is a 2004 with the 4.8L the other is a 2019 with the 6.2L. There is a big difference in power. Has anyone swapped a 4.8 for the 6.2? I'm assuming engine, trans, and wiring would all have to be done. I don't want to just swap a normal 6.2 in the truck though. I'm going to have it built as a sleeper. Looking at all the drivetrain and suspension.
 

rockola1971

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Posts
2,530
Reaction score
3,325
Location
Indiana (formerly IL)
I have 2 GMC Yukons. One is a 2004 with the 4.8L the other is a 2019 with the 6.2L. There is a big difference in power. Has anyone swapped a 4.8 for the 6.2? I'm assuming engine, trans, and wiring would all have to be done. I don't want to just swap a normal 6.2 in the truck though. I'm going to have it built as a sleeper. Looking at all the drivetrain and suspension.
Externally the 2 engines are dimensionally the same. So the engine will bolt right into place. The problem is that the 2004 engine is a Gen3 and the 2019 is a Gen4 and the difference there is the reluctor wheel on the crank which provides timing information to the PCM. The 2 engines use 2 different PCM's so the PCM will have to be changed and likely the wiring harness too.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,555
Reaction score
26,188
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
I have 2 GMC Yukons. One is a 2004 with the 4.8L the other is a 2019 with the 6.2L. There is a big difference in power. Has anyone swapped a 4.8 for the 6.2? I'm assuming engine, trans, and wiring would all have to be done. I don't want to just swap a normal 6.2 in the truck though. I'm going to have it built as a sleeper. Looking at all the drivetrain and suspension.
The different generations are not compatible computer wise. Your cluster cannot talk to the 6.2 and visa versa without a mountain of research and work.

Stick with a 6.0 of the same Gen III platform and consider supercharging or stroking it for more torque/power.
 

Joseph Garcia

Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
7,108
Reaction score
9,516
Welcome to the Forum from NH.

Lots of knowledgeable folks here who freely share their knowledge, experiences, and perspectives. Knowledge is power.

I hope that you will become a participating member in the Forum's discussions.

Pics of the truck, please.

You are already receiving sage advice from the knowledgeable folks on this Forum.

Way too much work required to make it a viable project.
 

Trey Hardy

8” fabtech icon coilovers uniballs 24x14on35/15.50
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Posts
3,057
Reaction score
7,959
Location
Eastern North Carolina
The different generations are not compatible computer wise. Your cluster cannot talk to the 6.2 and visa versa without a mountain of research and work.

Stick with a 6.0 of the same Gen III platform and consider supercharging or stroking it for more torque/power.
I second that it will be much easier/plug and play vs the newer generation plus its much easier to find a 6.0 in the scrapyard out a 99-06 then it is to find a lemon 6.2 in a special order truck or Denali
Note it would be worth finding a high output 6.0 out a 05-06 Cadillac or Denali vs out a 2500 work truck
 

Sam Harris

Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Posts
7,423
Reaction score
14,896
Location
Texas
Beyond what has already been stated, as far as I know, the 2019 engine is also an "LT" platform, using direct injection, as well as some other differences. Definitely not a simple swap. But if you were to swap all the PCM / TCM, wiring harness along with the mechanical portion, it's certainly feasible. I'd agree though, that a Gen 3 would be a much easier swap, and VERY straightforward.
 
Last edited:

Pyukon

TYF Newbie
Joined
Dec 21, 2019
Posts
12
Reaction score
26
Location
Independence, Ky
Lingenfelter makes a conversion box that makes the 58x readable to the 24x pcm for about $300. Having recently picked up another Yukon (that I didn't need... addiction is a REAL thing... lol), I now have a GMT400, GMT800, and GMT900. Hell, I've even got a GMT330 ZR2 Blazer. Regardless, the 259k mile L59 5.3 in my recently acquired 2wd 800 has what I believe to be a collapsed lifter. I have a 150k mi 6.2 L92 from a '08 Escalade on a stand in the garage that I picked up for next to nothing a couple years back under the guise that it'd be a "backup" for our 07 EXT that's now up to 181k and not missing a beat, with the exception of an exhaust leak from the manifold bolt heads popping off as usual. Point is, I'm gonna try going this route to shave 100lbs off the front end (aluminum block too) and pick up 100+hp when I swap out the VVT cam for a BTR Truck Norris (probably) set up. Figured the Lingenfelter box was worth mentioning tho. https://www.lingenfelter.com/product/L460065397.html
 

Marky Dissod

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Posts
1,668
Reaction score
2,274
Location
(718)-
So which is more cost-effective:
Lingenfelther's 58x/24x converter, or removing the 58x reluctor and affixing a 24x reluctor?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
131,341
Posts
1,849,320
Members
95,394
Latest member
Hawkeye1
Top