By the way, where did you get the information about the constant load on the engine in the city of 70-80%? Here is the load schedule, I am now driving around the city in the mode of 10-20-30 miles per hour. 70% is the peak when I accelerated a little, and so the average load is 25-30%
When you release the gas pedal, the engine stops supplying fuel to the cylinders at all, haha, you confuse DFM work with forced idling, or this is known as coasting. This was done on carburetor engines)))
Maybe you did not follow all the info I provided or if you needed to translate it did not come over correctly. I have NEVER indicated the engine was operating at 70%+ load in the city, non of my graphs I have posted showed this. All the 70%-100% loading was done on at highway speeds primarily in 10th gear, sometimes in 9th when the transmission downshifts. This is usually when pulling very slight to mild grades, nothing steep at all.
These seem to also be the typically conditions when these engines have failed/locked up as well, almost always traveling somewhere between 60-75 MPH from all the reports I have seen.
As for the tool you are using, based on its format and size I really do not think you have the ability for that tool to actually monitor cylinder deactivation. More advanced tools will show what cylinders are active/deactivated and will also typically give a running counter of how many times each cylinder has been deactivated. I think the running counter is actually stored in the ECM, the tool just has the ability to display these values.
I am not confusing DFM with what you refer to as forced coasting. I am quite familiar with DFCO (Decel With Fuel Cutoff), this typically turns off the fuel injectors and sometimes the ignition coils. This has been going one for probably 30+ years, nothing new about that. I am sure your tool can show you this, but in addition to DFCO it appears for some reason DFM also collapses the lifters during DFCO as well or at least under some conditions.
Not sure if this was done on the AFM vehicles, never spent much time with these. Prior to cylinder deactivation on any manufacturers platforms, DFCO was used, may have tweaked cam timing a bit if that capability was available, but each manufacturer would implement some form of DFCO how they saw fit. Sometime even transmission control could also be implemented. Depends if the manufacturer expects as full of a coast mode or if they want to introduce any engine braking.
Lots and lots of moving parts, probably too many moving parts. All this extra crap does nothing for the end users as far as reliability, it just costs us a lot of money and down time when it fails. AFM and DFM or any cylinder deactivation was never intended for performance and if the engineers thought it would help reliability they were clearly confused.