Engine choice for new Yukon XL Denali (best reliability for next 3 years)

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

killjoy

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Posts
18
Reaction score
12
I’ll chime in to say that the 5.3 gets an undeserved bad rap. I’d drive one before you make a decision.

I had same negative preconceived notions . Then I drove one and came away impressed.
The 5.3L has plenty of power. Drivability and towing... impression/feel... is not the issue. Very few of us are towing a 8k lb trailer with an SUV. If you are towing something that heavy, you'd be better off with a 5th wheel hitch on a pickup.

My 2021 has < 17k miles and has stranded me 3x all requiring a flat bed tow to the dealer. 2x for failed DFM lifters (that are still POS despite dealer assurances the problem if fixed)... and a failed fuel pump control module.
The 6.2 has the same issues with DFM lifters and fuel pump control modules as the 5.3, plus bad bearings.

Going with the 3.0 diesel avoids those problems, but if you're keeping it forever, you'll need to deal with oil pump belts, fuel pumps, etc. You also have to be willing to deal with a diesel - not the best for cold climates (e.g. starting, remote start idling).

At least with the GM pickups, you can opt for the cheap turbo 4 to avoid all the DFM BS. With the fullsize SUVs though, it feels like your choice is among 3 bad options... unless you wanted a diesel from the start.

I've had more than 2 dozen GM 5.3s since the late 1990s. Today's 5.3L engine is not the same as those in the past. All of the fuel efficiency BS is reducing reliability just so you can get an extra 0.2 MPG on the freeway and make the greenies happy.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
20,105
Reaction score
27,380
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Since the Feds just threw the CAFE and emissions standards into the garbage, look for the removal of certain emissions and gas saving features like AFM that will make the engines more reliable in the near future.
 

Padraig

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Posts
97
Reaction score
110
Diesel all the way. Additional maintenance is minimal, Def is no big thing. I have a Burban with 24,000 miles with zero issues. I am 76 years old and have owned muscle cars, pick ups, sedans and high performance boats. This baby Duramax rates as one of the sweetest engines I have ever owned!

Padraig
 

Tinbadtin

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Posts
159
Reaction score
139
Since very few have actually addressed your question let me attempt to. You seem to prioritize not getting stranded and there hasn’t been anyone so far being let down by the 3.0, stranded on the side of the road. On the other hand there are many stories of 6.2’s crapping out and leaving people stranded.

Aside from that data point, the miles you drive make the diesel a perfect fit. They are made for eating miles, you will be in the minority of buyers who will actually be economically way ahead with the diesel due to fuel economy being nearly double of the 6.2. Quite honestly I think in your situation the 3.0 is really a no brainer.

Whatever you end up choosing: happy motoring!
 

bobwass

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
Since very few have actually addressed your question let me attempt to. You seem to prioritize not getting stranded and there hasn’t been anyone so far being let down by the 3.0, stranded on the side of the road. On the other hand there are many stories of 6.2’s crapping out and leaving people stranded.

Aside from that data point, the miles you drive make the diesel a perfect fit. They are made for eating miles, you will be in the minority of buyers who will actually be economically way ahead with the diesel due to fuel economy being nearly double of the 6.2. Quite honestly I think in your situation the 3.0 is really a no brainer.

Whatever you end up choosing: happy motoring!
nailed it
 

fozzi58

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Posts
437
Reaction score
370
Location
North Jersey
I have to agree with @Tinbadtin

However, I remember reading that they were planning on putting the 2.7L Turbo 4 in the SUVs as the base engine option. If that was available, I would probably max out a Yukon XL SLT, forgo the Denali package and stick with the turbo 4.

Been driving my Dad's 22 Silverado around a couple months with that engine. I have to admit I am impressed by its response, power, and fuel economy. Its about on par with the 5.3 in terms of city driving economy but I think it does a lot better on the highway. And the Gen 3 8 speed transm9ssion is really nice.
 

ZKWBQD

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2022
Posts
181
Reaction score
141
I've recently been posting about GMC configurator issues as I try to get the Denali Reserve package (for its SuperCruise, alongside other features) as well as the Premium Capability Package with Active Response 4WD (included with Denali Reserve in MY2024, but separate option for MY2025, with configuration difficulty alongside Duramax).

Starting a new thread here to request advice on Yukon XL engine choice from more experienced members --- between the 6.2L V8 and the 3.0L Duramax (both LM2 on a new-on-lot MY2024 or LZO on new-to-order MY2025 are options). The 5.3L V8 is not under consideration.

Our situation is that we are a one-car family, and this would be our only car for our family of seven. We live in a semi-rural / rural mountain area, with all that typically involves:

(1) Elevation of 4000-5000 feet
(2) Annual snowfall of 3-6 feet
(3) Private gravel roads for the last few miles to our house until paved county roads
(4) Only one GM (Chevy / GMC) dealer / service-center within 1-2 hours of home
(5) Lots of daytime driving, but also significant nighttime driving (it gets dark at 5pm in winter)
(6) Monthly mileage of approximately 3000 miles (yes: 30,000+ miles per year), most of that on highways or rural county roads with little stop-and-go

Also, please assume:

(1) Frequent oil/filter changes
(2) All recommended maintenance done on schedule
(3) Disable of auto-start/stop technology

The high mileage is a particular cause of concern for us, given that there doesn't appear to be any bullet-proof engine for a new Yukon (XL) --- they all have different (seemingly early) failure modes. This post looks for advice on which is the one that might best meet our needs.

Due to concerns over engine reliability, as well as how quickly new safety features are being introduced for cars now-a-days, we plan to replace this Yukon XL after 2--3 years (with a new large SUV, probably another Yukon XL), since that would be 60,000 -- 90,000 miles.

We figure that all warranties will expire (in our case) based on mileage, rather than calendar years, so we view them as follows (when driving 30k+ miles per year):

(1) Bumper-to-bumper (@ 36k miles): Good for 1-year for us
(2) Powertrain (@ 60k miles): Good for 2-years for us
(3) GM Protection Plan (8-yr/100k Platinum): Good for 3-year for us

I'll be purchasing the above GM Protection Plan at the same time as the SUV (not necessarily from same dealer, though, as I've read on this forum which dealers often most aggressive pricing for GMPP).

Our significant concern is to avoid ever being stranded --- this is particularly top-of-mind for my wife, when she's driving kids around when I'm not also in the car. That's the reason we have in mind to only keep the car for three years, so we'll at least have some GMPP left for that third year.

Even so, I've read about very long (180 day?!?) wait times for engine replacement even under original warranty (especially with 6.2L), which gives us anxiety, as there are very few available loaner cars that will accommodate all of us safely. That's also driving the push for us to plan / budget for early replacement with another new SUV after just a few years.

But more than anything, we want to think hard about the gas vs. Duramax engine choice, given recent reports of the NHTSA investigation into the 870k 6.2L V8 engines. If reliability were the same, we'd definitely get the 6.2L V8, as my wife prefers that (given past familiarity with gas engines) and she'll be doing more of the driving (for kids' pickup/dropoff/activities). But reliability is going to probably end up driving this choice more than anything.

Please completely ignore the following factors in engine preference:

(1) Resale value between different engines (ie, cost)
(2) Fuel mileage between different engines (ie, cost)
(3) Towing benefits of Duramax (we tow very occasionally to never)
(4) Longer-term engine reliability (ie, above 150k miles, since we plan to replace at 3-years, well before that mileage)

Along with your opinion on engine choice, I'd really appreciate if you could provide an explanation for why you think that way. Finally, if you vote for the Duramax, please let me know if you have a preference between the LM2 vs. LZ0.

Thanks so much for reading such a long post, and providing your thoughts.
I would recommend a normally aspirated V8 engine that uses gasoline, not a diesel.
 

petethepug

Michael
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
3,396
Reaction score
3,828
Location
SoCal
Diesel, period. You’ll want / need the torque for all your passengers. You’ll love the range as well as love the opportunity to add a larger diesel tank. Not sure if GM has incorporated it yet but there is / was an option for a Jake / diesel / engine brake to make going down the mountain a breeze.
 

Eighthtry

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2022
Posts
45
Reaction score
29
I've recently been posting about GMC configurator issues as I try to get the Denali Reserve package (for its SuperCruise, alongside other features) as well as the Premium Capability Package with Active Response 4WD (included with Denali Reserve in MY2024, but separate option for MY2025, with configuration difficulty alongside Duramax).

Starting a new thread here to request advice on Yukon XL engine choice from more experienced members --- between the 6.2L V8 and the 3.0L Duramax (both LM2 on a new-on-lot MY2024 or LZO on new-to-order MY2025 are options). The 5.3L V8 is not under consideration.

Our situation is that we are a one-car family, and this would be our only car for our family of seven. We live in a semi-rural / rural mountain area, with all that typically involves:

(1) Elevation of 4000-5000 feet
(2) Annual snowfall of 3-6 feet
(3) Private gravel roads for the last few miles to our house until paved county roads
(4) Only one GM (Chevy / GMC) dealer / service-center within 1-2 hours of home
(5) Lots of daytime driving, but also significant nighttime driving (it gets dark at 5pm in winter)
(6) Monthly mileage of approximately 3000 miles (yes: 30,000+ miles per year), most of that on highways or rural county roads with little stop-and-go

Also, please assume:

(1) Frequent oil/filter changes
(2) All recommended maintenance done on schedule
(3) Disable of auto-start/stop technology

The high mileage is a particular cause of concern for us, given that there doesn't appear to be any bullet-proof engine for a new Yukon (XL) --- they all have different (seemingly early) failure modes. This post looks for advice on which is the one that might best meet our needs.

Due to concerns over engine reliability, as well as how quickly new safety features are being introduced for cars now-a-days, we plan to replace this Yukon XL after 2--3 years (with a new large SUV, probably another Yukon XL), since that would be 60,000 -- 90,000 miles.

We figure that all warranties will expire (in our case) based on mileage, rather than calendar years, so we view them as follows (when driving 30k+ miles per year):

(1) Bumper-to-bumper (@ 36k miles): Good for 1-year for us
(2) Powertrain (@ 60k miles): Good for 2-years for us
(3) GM Protection Plan (8-yr/100k Platinum): Good for 3-year for us

I'll be purchasing the above GM Protection Plan at the same time as the SUV (not necessarily from same dealer, though, as I've read on this forum which dealers often most aggressive pricing for GMPP).

Our significant concern is to avoid ever being stranded --- this is particularly top-of-mind for my wife, when she's driving kids around when I'm not also in the car. That's the reason we have in mind to only keep the car for three years, so we'll at least have some GMPP left for that third year.

Even so, I've read about very long (180 day?!?) wait times for engine replacement even under original warranty (especially with 6.2L), which gives us anxiety, as there are very few available loaner cars that will accommodate all of us safely. That's also driving the push for us to plan / budget for early replacement with another new SUV after just a few years.

But more than anything, we want to think hard about the gas vs. Duramax engine choice, given recent reports of the NHTSA investigation into the 870k 6.2L V8 engines. If reliability were the same, we'd definitely get the 6.2L V8, as my wife prefers that (given past familiarity with gas engines) and she'll be doing more of the driving (for kids' pickup/dropoff/activities). But reliability is going to probably end up driving this choice more than anything.

Please completely ignore the following factors in engine preference:

(1) Resale value between different engines (ie, cost)
(2) Fuel mileage between different engines (ie, cost)
(3) Towing benefits of Duramax (we tow very occasionally to never)
(4) Longer-term engine reliability (ie, above 150k miles, since we plan to replace at 3-years, well before that mileage)

Along with your opinion on engine choice, I'd really appreciate if you could provide an explanation for why you think that way. Finally, if you vote for the Duramax, please let me know if you have a preference between the LM2 vs. LZ0.

Thanks so much for reading such a long post, and providing your thoughts.
I just traded a 2011 GMC Yukon Denali XL. It had 203,000 miles on it. The only differences I have from you is 7 kids, 5,000 feet, and a Queen. No mountains, just hills. Lots of in-town driving, but in Dallas that is a bunch of freeways to get to the in-town driving.

Your thread assumes that things, LOTS of things, will go bad on these vehicles. That is just NOT TRUE for almost all of these vehicles and the vast majority of drivers. I have owned Suburbans and Yukons since 1984. I have put between 200,000 to 300,000(only one of these) miles on all of them. I found ALL of them to be trouble free. No drivetrain problems. No engine problems. No pump problems. No computer problems.

Speaking specifically about my last one, a 2011 200,000 mile loaded GMC Yukon Denali XL, the only one with the 6.2 with the deadly cylinder deactivation feature that supposedly got me tons of extra mpg when in V4 mode. I kept hoping it would go out so I could replace the heads and let me put more cam in it. Never happened. So now I will disclose, in excruciating detail, all the problems I had with it.

I replaced a broken front sway bar and the MagnaRide shocks, both at about 180,000 miles. The shocks were fine, but it was due about 15,000 miles of road trips coming in the next year, so what the hell. I added a rear sway bar at that time as well. I noticed that the rear leveling part of the MagnaRides was not working, so I replaced the air compressor. I replaced two of the dreaded broken exhaust manifold bolts only because I saw, never heard, they were broken at about 60,000 miles. I had it aligned twice. I changed filters at 5,000 miles and oil/filters at 10,000 miles. I replaced brake pads three times (never had to touch the rotors). I replaced belts and hoses and changed the radiator fluid at the same time at around 120,000 miles (preventive maintenance). When I remembered I would grease what few Zerk fittings it had. It used no, as in zero, as in nil, oil between changes. I did replace transmission fluid and filter at around 120,000 miles, but only because I felt sorry for it.

I did nothing else, as in NOTHING ELSE, to ANYTHING. EVERYTHING worked. INCLUDING cylinder deactivation. ALL the way. I hated to sell it, but was afraid of the road trips. I figured somethiing was due to break. I was also afraid of the Queen.

Now someone may say that was very unusual. I call BS on that. All of my others since 1984 have performed the exact same way.

This forum is a very small subset of people that really do have problems. It happens. But it can seem in a forum that it happens to everyone. Don't let anyone scare you away from a new GMC Yukon Denali XL. Good luck with finding something else. Ford? Jeep? The Queen hated them both.

AS for the engine, the 6.2 has been around a looong time. The Duramax? Let's just say I would get nowhere near a deisel unles I was towing and working out of a 3/4 ton+ truck.

The downside to a new Yukon may be the transmission. It reminds me of the newly introduced 700r4 days. One of the weakest transmissions in its early days. It is now one of the best and most reliable transmissions out there. Put one in my 1961 Chevrolet TPI Apache 10.

My take on it from 55+ years of driving automatics. GM had some time to get real world problems with their 10-speed. You never mentioned that. They have them worked out for the most part. I have a 2021 Ford 10-speed that works better, I think, than my 2023 Yukon 10 speed. But they both have had plenty of time to get the real world problems sorted through. So don't worry about that.

I bought the extended warranty because I am scared to death of the electronics, as anyone should be these days.

So if you want to worry about something, worry about the 10-speed. Worry about the 20 computers all plugged together trying to interpret who to take orders from and who is in charge anyway. I think you are overworrying 200,000 trouble free miles. And you are only talking 90,000 miles.

You are wasting a bunch of reliability.

OK, someone jump me.
 

Eighthtry

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2022
Posts
45
Reaction score
29
Oh, and while I am at it, I would under no circumstances buy an undersized 6 cylinder diesel engine that must be power enhanced with a turbo to get power close to the 6.2. Turbos can and will go out. Ford has plenty of experience on the V6 turbos. And they will do exactly that. Plus you will be using a turbo going up hills, further stressing it. If I were buying a used Yukon there is no way I would consider a smelly 3.0 6 cylinder turbocharged engine.

In fact, I wish I could have my 2010 Cadillac V 6.2 Supercharged 556 HP and 552 lbs torque engine in my 23 Yukon. It went 208,000 miles and I was into it all the time. Same experience and maintenance as my Yukons and Suburbans. Oh hell, my Z06 650/650 would be servicable as well.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
133,713
Posts
1,889,828
Members
98,977
Latest member
BLACKTahoe2016
Top