Bad mpg?

[Antonm]

Since your knowledge is so vast and impressive it should be easy.

It was easy, because what we're talking about is 101 level stuff, sorry you're not grasping it.
...

 

[Antonm]

I have offered a plausible explanation with facts and solid theoretical basis.

Your turn…

lol, no you've offered clueless explanations based off your own gross conceptual errors in understanding.

You started off by trolling another member with your smart aleck comments of "how does an 02 sensor force an air fuel ratio" bit, then when he (or she maybe, their screenname has "Mark" in it, so I assume they're a "he") took the time to actually respond, you just kept at it even though you don't actually know a damn thing (like a lot of internet trolls actually)
...

 

[Antonm]

How exactly do you know this?

Do you have an afr vs hp ( or throttle position)chart you can share?

Fuel tables in the ecm aren’t just stoichiometric or full enrichment.

Why don't you post your tables that prove it doesn't there Kemosabe.
...

 

[Antonm]

A dismissive post with ad hominem is usually a good indicator of weakness.

Slow clap.

Claiming a moral victory when the facts of the subject / topic are not in your favor and prove you wrong,,, where have I seen this tactic before,,, are you a politician?

Let me re-phrase your statement above into plain English "I'm wrong, but he's mean, so that makes me right by default ,,,slow clap"

And I bet you also wonder why I think you're clueless too.
...

 

[blanchard7684]

Yeap, you're clueless , but at least you had the good sense to go back and edit this little gem out out of your original post that contained it.

View attachment 447539

...

Yeah that was an editing accident . Big whoop.

 

[blanchard7684]

Claiming a moral victory when the facts of the subject / topic are not in your favor and prove you wrong,,, where have I seen this tactic before,,, are you a politician?

Let me re-phrase your statement above into plain English "I'm wrong, but he's mean, so that makes me right by default ,,,slow clap"

And I bet you also wonder why I think you're clueless too.
...

The facts are not in your favor here.

You keep claiming but you are wrong.

I’ve explained why.

Sorry this isn’t a return policy for range disabler.

 

[blanchard7684]

lol, no you've offered clueless explanations based off your own gross conceptual errors in understanding.

You started off by trolling another member with your smart aleck comments of "how does an 02 sensor force an air fuel ratio" bit, then when he (or she maybe, their screenname has "Mark" in it, so I assume they're a "he") took the time to actually respond, you just kept at it even though you don't actually know a damn thing (like a lot of internet trolls actually)
...

Yep that is right and you jumped into a discussion you don’t have the shoes for

Keep hitting up Wikipedia for your info

 

[Antonm]

Yeah that was an editing accident . Big whoop.

RIIIGHT


You typed out an complete sentence of shear stupidly, then erased it,,, and it was an editing accident.

Your are a Politician aren't you, or at least you lie like one.
...

 

[blanchard7684]

Easy, because they're moving the same mass at the same rate, and therefore using the same amount of energy,,, maybe go back and review , because we've been over this before.
...

Ehhhhhh!

I never said “ same rate”. Way to slip that straw man in.

I was talking about part throttle… all else being equal.

Again… explain this phenomenon with facts, theory, or experimental proof or just take the L ( again) and move on.

 

[blanchard7684]

RIIIGHT
View attachment 447541

You typed out an complete sentence of shear stupidly, they erased it and it was an editing accident.

Your are a Politician aren't you, or at least you lie like like one.
...

I stand by the statement and erased it on accident .


Ohh you caught me.

Refute that statement then if it is so stupid. Should be easy for a genius like you.