OFFICIAL: 2015.5 (2015i) Discussion Thread

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

George C

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2014
Posts
466
Reaction score
6
Location
Buffalo, NY
Well if that's what we're comparing then yes. My F250 with a H&S programer, full deletes, and exhaust will walk the dog on our Yukon. And any other red light renegade that pulls up. But to say it's underpowered is a bit much I think. Personally I guess I don't notice it. Granted it's no Vette, but I feel it does ok.

I don't believe I was drawing comparisons to my truck. My truck makes almost three times the torque.
Like I said above, I have a 6.2 coming, and I am happy say good bye to the 5.3L.
You may have not noticed it before, but im thinking now you will..
 

Goodinblack

I Like Tacos
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Posts
22,295
Reaction score
3,040
Location
Dirty South
5.3 are like having a V6 when loaded and would be even worse when towing.

On the other hand you really want to tow.... you need a diesel truck imo

By tow I mean tow. Not jet ski type crap
 

Pockets

Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2013
Posts
3,123
Reaction score
275
Location
West Ga
5.3 are like having a V6 when loaded and would be even worse when towing.

On the other hand you really want to tow.... you need a diesel truck imo

By tow I mean tow. Not jet ski type crap
This is the reason for havin my 250...
 

George C

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2014
Posts
466
Reaction score
6
Location
Buffalo, NY
Diesel owners know that it's not about peak horsepower or peak torque. It's about where those numbers peak vs. RPM.
Diesel engines make massive torque in the mid teens to the high 2000s. Right where we need it.
Now I'm not comparing the 5.3l to a diesel, but this low RPM power band is also being achieved in gasoline engines. Not as great as diesel, but its starting to get much better.

I cant seem to find the graphs, but I do remember what they looked like.
Peak 5.3L numbers are reached at the upper 4000s of the RPM scale, and that's an area that's out of bounds and unuseable for 99% or us. Nobody runs at 4500rpm plus..... It does not have a spike in torque around the spot where we all drive the most. I see it in the hills on a freeway. There simply isn't anything there to haul overdrive at speed when confronted by a hill or headwind.

The 6.2 and the Ford Ecoboost hits sweet spot of torque right where we need it, around 2000 rpm, and hold max torque right on up.
If GM Wants to to tout 5.3l power, they need to make more of it where we all use it, and not having to run wide open to get to it.

I guess I might be beating a dead horse, but why buy an extremely heavy SUV with a smaller engine when a larger one is more capable?

Maybe the reason is that those of us with a 6.2L on order..simply aren't driving it.:chair:
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
motorwerks

motorwerks

Full Access Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Posts
315
Reaction score
0
Location
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
Did anyone receive their TPW schedule for their vehicle orders yet? Mine so far is 10/6/2014. Crossing my fingers that nothing makes it deviate from there.
 

humer101

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Posts
1,278
Reaction score
221
Location
NJ,USA
Did anyone receive their TPW schedule for their vehicle orders yet? Mine so far is 10/6/2014. Crossing my fingers that nothing makes it deviate from there.
Only quality control can hold the car longer. Good luck
 

olyelr

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
1,696
Reaction score
832
Location
Elk Rapids, MI
I guess I might be beating a dead horse, but why buy an extremely heavy SUV with a smaller engine when a larger one is more capable?

For me, it was basically the fact that it cost about 8-10 grand more to get that bigger motor. Of course there are a few more gizmo's along with the motor, but it just didn't make sense to me.

That, and the fact that we rarely tow anything with it, so the bigger motor just isn't needed. Honestly, so far I think the 5.3 is a fabulous motor that drives very well in our Yukon. But with less than 1000 miles logged so far, with no long trips, no mountains, and no towing I don't have much experience with it. But normal day to day driving, I am just peachy with the little guy.
 

07Burb

GM fan for life
Staff member
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Posts
50,322
Reaction score
17,039
When tuned the 5.3 is really a very capable motor even in these big SUVs
 

PokerMunkee

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Posts
239
Reaction score
0
Location
Woodland Park, CO
When do we think the 5.3L trucks will get the new 8 speed?

If the 5.3 got the 8 speed and HIDs, I'd gladly rock a SLT Yukon XL and save almost $10K over a Denali.

Is there any EPA numbers for the new 8 speed? Is the 6.2L 4X4 still rated 20MPG highway??
 

humer101

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Posts
1,278
Reaction score
221
Location
NJ,USA
When do we think the 5.3L trucks will get the new 8 speed?

If the 5.3 got the 8 speed and HIDs, I'd gladly rock a SLT Yukon XL and save almost $10K over a Denali.

Is there any EPA numbers for the new 8 speed? Is the 6.2L 4X4 still rated 20MPG highway??
Only 6.2 engine will getting 8 speed, Denali, escalade.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
132,054
Posts
1,861,653
Members
96,511
Latest member
Like_Duh
Top